Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35788127›Full record

SynthesisSpinal cord series and cases2022

Pharmacologic therapies of pain in patients with spinal cord injury: a systematic review.

Mohammad Hossein Asgardoon, Seyed Behnam Jazayeri, Atefeh Behkar, Mohammad Amin Dabbagh Ohadi, Hossein Yarmohammadi, Zahra Ghodsi, Tommaso Ivan Pomerani, Mojtaba Mojtahedzadeh, Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Spinal cord series and cases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Mohammad Hossein AsgardoonSina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-2029-1816
Seyed Behnam JazayeriSina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-2860-6496
Atefeh BehkarSina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Amin Dabbagh OhadiSina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hossein YarmohammadiMedical Students Research Committee, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.
Zahra GhodsiSina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Tommaso Ivan PomeraniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, School of Human Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5744-7274
Mojtaba MojtahedzadehDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Critical Care Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Vafa Rahimi-MovagharSina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. v_rahimi@sina.tums.ac.ir.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRShahed University · IRUniversal Scientific Education and Research Network · IRUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designSystematic review.

objectivesThis systematic review evaluates all randomized clinical trials (RCTs) conducted on assessing the efficacy and safety of pharmacologic therapies for the treatment of Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)-associated pain.

methodsThe PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane library online databases were searched from 1946 to May 2019 using specific search terms for SCI, pain, and RCTs meeting predetermined inclusion criteria. The efficacy outcome of interest was pain reduction, discontinuations, and adverse events (AEs).

resultsOf 2746 records identified through database searching, 703 duplicates were deleted. 1814 were excluded, the full text of the remaining 230 articles was reviewed, and finally, 28 papers were selected for drafting. The most studied medications were pregabalin, gabapentin, amitriptyline, and ketamine. Pregabalin, gabapentin, and amitriptyline reduced VAS by more than 30%, and ketamine reduced VAS by 40%. Oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, alfentanil, tramadol, and morphine added to clonidine, baclofen, and botulinum toxin type A (BTA) significantly reduced pain compared with placebo. On the other hand, valproate, levetiracetam, trazodone, and duloxetine did not significantly alleviate SCI-associated pain compared to placebo. The risks of AEs and discontinuations in anticonvulsants were the least, while it was highest in analgesics.

conclusionsStudies of SCI-associated pain were few, small, heterogenic in measures and values, and did not allow quantitative comparisons of efficacy. However, available data suggested pregabalin and gabapentin led to a more marked reduction in SCI-associated pain with fewer AEs. Additional clinical studies are needed to assess the effect of established and novel management options.

Indexed as

KetamineSpinal Cord InjuriesAmitriptylineAnticonvulsantsGabapentinHumansPainPregabalinAmitriptylineAnticonvulsantsGabapentinKetaminePregabalin

Identifiers

PMID35788127
PMCPMC9253022
OpenAlexW4283813262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.