Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35788071›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2022

Adverse drug reactions, multimorbidity and polypharmacy: a prospective analysis of 1 month of medical admissions.

Rostam Osanlou, Lauren Walker, Dyfrig A Hughes, Girvan Burnside, Munir Pirmohamed

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
19.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 168 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Impact of structured medication reviews on prescribing in English primary care: a retrospective observational cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Observational

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rostam OsanlouDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7484-4474
Lauren WalkerDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Dyfrig A HughesCentre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8247-7459
Girvan BurnsideDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Munir PirmohamedDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK Munirp@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7534-7266
University of Liverpool · GBBangor University · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L006758/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo ascertain the burden and associated cost of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), polypharmacy and multimorbidity through a prospective analysis of all medical admissions to a large university teaching hospital over a 1-month period.

designProspective observational study.

settingLiverpool University Hospital Foundation National Health Service (NHS) Trust, England.

participantsAll medical admissions with greater than 24-hour stay over a 1-month period.

main outcome measuresPrevalence of admissions due to an ADR and associated mortality, prevalence and association of multimorbidity and polypharmacy with ADRs, and estimated local financial cost of admissions where an ADR was a contributing or main reason for admission with projected costs for NHS in England.

resultsThere were 218 identified patient admissions with an ADR giving a prevalence of 18.4%. The majority of these (90.4%) were ADRs that directly resulted in or contributed to admission. ADRs thus accounted for 16.5% of total admissions. Those with an ADR were on average taking more medicines (10.5 vs 7.8, p<0.01) and had more comorbidities than those without an ADR (6.1 vs 5.2, p<0.01). Drugs most commonly implicated were diuretics, steroid inhalers, anticoagulants and antiplatelets, proton pump inhibitors, chemotherapeutic agents and antihypertensives. 40.4% of ADRs were classified avoidable or possibly avoidable. The mortality rate due to an ADR was 0.34%. The average length of stay for those with an ADR was 6 days. Direct 1-month cost to the Trust from ADR admissions was £490 716. Extrapolated nationally, the projected annual cost to the NHS in England is 2.21 billion.

conclusionThe local prevalence of admission and mortality from ADRs is higher than previously reported. Important factors that could be contributing to this include polypharmacy and multimorbidity. ADRs place a significant burden on patients and healthcare services with associated financial implications. Reducing inappropriate polypharmacy should be a major aim for preventing ADRs.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPolypharmacyHospitalizationHumansMultimorbidityState MedicineAdverse eventsCLINICAL PHARMACOLOGYHEALTH ECONOMICSINTERNAL MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID35788071
PMCPMC9255409
OpenAlexW4283796715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.