ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2022
Deep Learning-Based Automatic Detection of Brain Metastases in Heterogenous Multi-Institutional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sets: An Exploratory Analysis of NRG-CC001.
Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Anatomic Contextual Information on the Performance of a Convolutional Neural Network Tasked With Brain Metastasis Detection.Advances in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Clinical and MRI factors influencing interobserver delineation variability of brain metastases before stereotactic radiotherapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026Article
- An advanced automated pipeline for brain tumour segmentation on magnetic resonance imaging for gamma knife radiosurgery.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- A 3D Convolutional Neural Network Based on Non-enhanced Brain CT to Identify Patients with Brain Metastases.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Automated segmentation of brain metastases in T1-weighted contrast-enhanced MR images pre and post stereotactic radiosurgery.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in the task of segmentation and classification of brain metastases images: current challenges and future opportunities.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Extended nnU-Net for Brain Metastasis Detection and Segmentation in Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging With a Large Multi-Institutional Data Set.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025Article
- Article
- Predicting treatment response in multicenter non-small cell lung cancer patients based on federated learning.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Where Does Auto-Segmentation for Brain Metastases Radiosurgery Stand Today?Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Novel radiotherapeutic strategies in the management of brain metastases: Challenging the dogma.Neuro-oncology · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence Detection and Segmentation Models: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Brain Tumors in Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2024Article
- Correlating volumetric and linear measurements of brain metastases on MRI scans using intelligent automation software: a preliminary study.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023Article
- Deep Learning for Detecting Brain Metastases on MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDeep learning-based algorithms have been shown to be able to automatically detect and segment brain metastases (BMs) in magnetic resonance imaging, mostly based on single-institutional data sets. This work aimed to investigate the use of deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) for BM detection and segmentation on a highly heterogeneous multi-institutional data set. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 407 patients from 98 institutions were randomly split into 326 patients from 78 institutions for training/validation and 81 patients from 20 institutions for unbiased testing. The data set contained T1-weighted gadolinium and T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging acquired on diverse scanners using different pulse sequences and various acquisition parameters. Several variants of 3-dimensional U-Net based DCNN models were trained and tuned using 5-fold cross validation on the training set. Performances of different models were compared based on Dice similarity coefficient for segmentation and sensitivity and false positive rate (FPR) for detection. The best performing model was evaluated on the test set.
resultsA DCNN with an input size of 64 × 64 × 64 and an equal number of 128 kernels for all convolutional layers using instance normalization was identified as the best performing model (Dice similarity coefficient 0.73, sensitivity 0.86, and FPR 1.9) in the 5-fold cross validation experiments. The best performing model demonstrated consistent behavior on the test set (Dice similarity coefficient 0.73, sensitivity 0.91, and FPR 1.7) and successfully detected 7 BMs (out of 327) that were missed during manual delineation. For large BMs with diameters greater than 12 mm, the sensitivity and FPR improved to 0.98 and 0.3, respectively.
conclusionsThe DCNN model developed can automatically detect and segment brain metastases with reasonable accuracy, high sensitivity, and low FPR on a multi-institutional data set with nonprespecified and highly variable magnetic resonance imaging sequences. For large BMs, the model achieved clinically relevant results. The model is robust and may be potentially used in real-world situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.