Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35787927›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2022

Deep Learning-Based Automatic Detection of Brain Metastases in Heterogenous Multi-Institutional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sets: An Exploratory Analysis of NRG-CC001.

Ying Liang, Karen Lee, Joseph A Bovi, Joshua D Palmer, Paul D Brown, Vinai Gondi, Wolfgang A Tomé, Tammie L S Benzinger, Minesh P Mehta, X Allen Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Clinical and MRI factors influencing interobserver delineation variability of brain metastases before stereotactic radiotherapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ying LiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Karen LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Joseph A BoviDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Joshua D PalmerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute at the Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Paul D BrownDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Vinai GondiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center and Proton Center, Warrenville, Illinois.
Wolfgang A ToméDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
Tammie L S BenzingerDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Minesh P MehtaMiami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida.
X Allen LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Electronic address: ali@mcw.edu.

Funding

NRG Oncology NCORP Research Base-BIQSFPUG1CA189867 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI Deborah Watkins Bruner, Lisa A. Kachnic · 2014 to 2026
$140.5M
IROC: Enhancing local enrolling site radiological data capture capabilities for NCTN trialsU24CA180803 · NCI · AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY · PI Thomas J. FitzGerald, MICHAEL V KNOPP · 2014 to 2026
$116.2M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA180803NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189867
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDeep learning-based algorithms have been shown to be able to automatically detect and segment brain metastases (BMs) in magnetic resonance imaging, mostly based on single-institutional data sets. This work aimed to investigate the use of deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) for BM detection and segmentation on a highly heterogeneous multi-institutional data set. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 407 patients from 98 institutions were randomly split into 326 patients from 78 institutions for training/validation and 81 patients from 20 institutions for unbiased testing. The data set contained T1-weighted gadolinium and T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging acquired on diverse scanners using different pulse sequences and various acquisition parameters. Several variants of 3-dimensional U-Net based DCNN models were trained and tuned using 5-fold cross validation on the training set. Performances of different models were compared based on Dice similarity coefficient for segmentation and sensitivity and false positive rate (FPR) for detection. The best performing model was evaluated on the test set.

resultsA DCNN with an input size of 64 × 64 × 64 and an equal number of 128 kernels for all convolutional layers using instance normalization was identified as the best performing model (Dice similarity coefficient 0.73, sensitivity 0.86, and FPR 1.9) in the 5-fold cross validation experiments. The best performing model demonstrated consistent behavior on the test set (Dice similarity coefficient 0.73, sensitivity 0.91, and FPR 1.7) and successfully detected 7 BMs (out of 327) that were missed during manual delineation. For large BMs with diameters greater than 12 mm, the sensitivity and FPR improved to 0.98 and 0.3, respectively.

conclusionsThe DCNN model developed can automatically detect and segment brain metastases with reasonable accuracy, high sensitivity, and low FPR on a multi-institutional data set with nonprespecified and highly variable magnetic resonance imaging sequences. For large BMs, the model achieved clinically relevant results. The model is robust and may be potentially used in real-world situations.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDeep LearningGadoliniumHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingGadolinium

Identifiers

PMID35787927
PMCPMC9641965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.