ArticleBMC public health2022
Health impacts of PM
Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Determinants and relationships of climate change, climate change hazards, mental health, and well-being: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Health Economic Assessment of PMInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Uterine Vulnerability to Environmental PMInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Macrophage exosomal ADAM10 mediates alveolar epithelial apoptosis induced by wood smoke PMCell biology and toxicology · 2026Article
- Ambient air quality and health impacts of PMScience advances · 2026Article
- Therapeutic Potential of Herbal Medicines in Combating Particulate Matter (PM)-Induced Health Effects: Insights from Recent Studies.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- High resolution mapping of nitrogen dioxide and particulate matter in Great Britain (2003-2021) with multi-stage data reconstruction and ensemble machine learning methods.Atmospheric pollution research · 2024Article
- Assessing the Oxidative Potential of Outdoor PMACS ES&T air · 2024Article
- Two Decades of Air Pollution Health Risk Assessment: Insights From the Use of WHO's AirQ and AirQ+ Tools.Public health reviews · 2024Review
- A global review of the state of the evidence of household air pollution's contribution to ambient fine particulate matter and their related health impacts.Environment international · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResidential wood combustion (RWC) is one of the largest sources of fine particles (PM
methodsHealth impact assessment (HIA) was employed as the methodology to quantify the health burden. Firstly, the RWC induced annual average PM
resultsAmongst the studied city areas, the local RWC induced PM
conclusionsAll four Nordic city areas have a substantial amount of domestic heating, and RWC is one of the most significant sources of PM
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.