Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35787514›Full record

ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2022

Dose-Response Relationship of a Blended In-Person and Online Family-Based Childhood Obesity Management Program: Secondary Analysis of a Behavior Intervention.

Sam Liu, Nicholas Smith, Kayla Nuss, Megan Perdew, Dimas Adiputranto, Patti-Jean Naylor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sam LiuSchool of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2364-7774
Nicholas SmithSchool of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6574-6557
Kayla NussSchool of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7914-5944
Megan PerdewSchool of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5870-6127
Dimas AdiputrantoSchool of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3506-2810
Patti-Jean NaylorSchool of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4799-2751
University of Victoria · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Early Intervention Program (EIP) was a 10-week, blended, in-person and online lifestyle intervention for families with children who were off the healthy weight trajectory. The engagement pattern and the dose response of EIP have not been examined.

objectiveThe aims of this paper are to examine families' engagement patterns with the EIP and to evaluate the dose-response relationship between EIP engagement patterns and physical activity and healthy eating-related outcomes at 10 weeks.

methodsFamilies with children (8-12 years old) who are off the healthy weight trajectory (child BMI ≥85th percentile for age and sex) were recruited. Pre- and postintervention questionnaires assessed child lifestyle behaviors, parental support behaviors, family lifestyle habits, as well as parental physical activity and healthy-eating identity. Hierarchical cluster analysis of both in-person and online components was used to classify engagement patterns. Regression analysis assessed differences in outcomes by engagement groups.

resultsTwo distinct clusters of engagement groups were identified (N=66), which were in-person (IP; n=40, 61%) and in-person + online (IP+; n=26, 39%) engagement. Relative to the IP group at week 10, IP+ showed a greater child moderate-to-vigorous physical activity level (1.53, SD 0.56; P=.008), child physical activity confidence (1.04, SD 0.37; P=.007), parental support for child physical activity (5.54, SD 2.57; P=.04) and healthy eating (2.43, SD 1.16; P=.04), family habits for physical activity (3.02, SD 1.50; P=.049) and healthy eating (3.95, SD 1.84; P=.04), and parental identity for physical activity (2.82, SD 1.19; P=.02).

conclusionsThe online EIP portal complemented the in-person sessions. Additional engagement with the portal was associated with greater improvements in child physical activity and parental support behaviors, habits, and identity for physical activity.

Indexed as

childchildhood obesitydietdose responseengagementexercisefamiliesfamilyfamily supportfitnesshealthy eatinginterventionlifestyleobesityonline portalparentparental supportphysical activityweb basedweb-based interventionweight

Identifiers

PMID35787514
PMCPMC9297142
OpenAlexW4283824000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.