Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35787295›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2022

PCycDB: a comprehensive and accurate database for fast analysis of phosphorus cycling genes.

Jiaxiong Zeng, Qichao Tu, Xiaoli Yu, Lu Qian, Cheng Wang, Longfei Shu, Fei Liu, Shengwei Liu, Zhijian Huang, Jianguo He and 2 more

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Organic amendments boost maize yield (Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jiaxiong ZengEnvironmental Microbiomics Research Center, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Qichao TuInstitute of Marine Science and Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao, 266237, China.
Xiaoli YuEnvironmental Microbiomics Research Center, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Lu QianEnvironmental Microbiomics Research Center, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Cheng WangEnvironmental Microbiomics Research Center, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Longfei ShuEnvironmental Microbiomics Research Center, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Fei LiuEnvironmental Microbiomics Research Center, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Shengwei LiuEnvironmental Microbiomics Research Center, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Zhijian HuangEnvironmental Microbiomics Research Center, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Jianguo HeEnvironmental Microbiomics Research Center, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Qingyun YanEnvironmental Microbiomics Research Center, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China. yanqy6@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Zhili HeEnvironmental Microbiomics Research Center, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China. hezhili@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhosphorus (P) is one of the most essential macronutrients on the planet, and microorganisms (including bacteria and archaea) play a key role in P cycling in all living things and ecosystems. However, our comprehensive understanding of key P cycling genes (PCGs) and microorganisms (PCMs) as well as their ecological functions remains elusive even with the rapid advancement of metagenome sequencing technologies. One of major challenges is a lack of a comprehensive and accurately annotated P cycling functional gene database.

resultsIn this study, we constructed a well-curated P cycling database (PCycDB) covering 139 gene families and 10 P metabolic processes, including several previously ignored PCGs such as pafA encoding phosphate-insensitive phosphatase, ptxABCD (phosphite-related genes), and novel aepXVWPS genes for 2-aminoethylphosphonate transporters. We achieved an annotation accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.8%, 96.1%, 99.9%, 99.8%, and 99.9%, respectively, for simulated gene datasets. Compared to other orthology databases, PCycDB is more accurate, more comprehensive, and faster to profile the PCGs. We used PCycDB to analyze P cycling microbial communities from representative natural and engineered environments and showed that PCycDB could apply to different environments.

conclusionsWe demonstrate that PCycDB is a powerful tool for advancing our understanding of microbially driven P cycling in the environment with high coverage, high accuracy, and rapid analysis of metagenome sequencing data. The PCycDB is available at https://github.com/ZengJiaxiong/Phosphorus-cycling-database . Video Abstract.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaPhosphorusBacteriaDatabases, FactualMetagenomePhosphorusAccuracyComprehensivenessDatabaseMetagenome sequencing dataPhosphorus cycling gene/microorganism

Identifiers

PMID35787295
PMCPMC9252087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.