ArticleJournal of eating disorders2022
Evaluation of a model of online, facilitated, peer group supervision for dietitians working in eating disorders.
Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Essential Training for an Essential Role: Dietitians and Eating Disorder Care.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026Article
- Reflect, Grow, Connect: A Pilot Study on the Potential Benefits of Facilitated Group Supervision for Radiation Therapists.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2026Article
- ANZAED eating disorder credentialed clinician perceptions and experiences of professional development.Journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
- Outcomes of professional development to support capacity to provide eating disorder treatment and exploration of service level barriers.Journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
- The ANZAED Eating Disorder Credential for health care providers: clinician perspectives.Journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
- "People want better": a qualitative exploration of stakeholders' views on introducing well-being coordinators in the screen industry.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2024Article
- Exploring the eating disorder curricula of accredited university dietetic programs in Australia and New Zealand.Journal of eating disorders · 2023Article
- Evaluation of a model of online, facilitated, peer group supervision for dietitians working in eating disorders.Journal of eating disorders · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe recently published Australia and New Zealand Academy of Eating Disorders (ANZAED) practice and training standards for dietitians providing eating disorder treatment recommended dietitians working in eating disorders (EDs) seek further clinical experience, training, and supervision to provide effective evidence-informed treatment. Access to dietetic clinical supervision is problematic, secondary to limited trained supervisors, location, cost, and lack of organizational support. Demand for clinical supervision increased with the 2022 introduction of ANZAED credentialing for eating disorder (ED) clinicians in Australia and addition of the Eating Disorder Management Plan to the Medicare Benefits Scheme. In 2018, QuEDS piloted a model of online peer group supervision with the goal of increasing service capacity to provide ED-specific clinical supervision to dietitians. Positive evaluation of the pilot led to the rollout of QuEDS Facilitated Peer Supervision (QuEDS FPS) program which was evaluated for utility and acceptability.
methodsBy August 2021 five QuEDS FPS groups were established each with a maximum of 10 Queensland-based dietitians from public hospital, community, or private practice plus an additional Facilitator and Co-facilitator. A total of 76 participants enrolled in the program over the study period in addition to the 10 participants from the pilot program. Participant experience was evaluated with anonymous, voluntary surveys at baseline (59 responses), 6 months follow-up (37 responses), plus a one-off survey in August 2021 (50 responses). Pilot participant's Baseline and Follow-up surveys were not included in this evaluation.
resultsSurvey responses were positive across the four Kirkpatrick training evaluation domains of reaction, learning, behavior, and results. Respondents reported positive change to clinical practice (98%), including increased confidence to implement evidence-informed guidelines, and improved engagement with, and advocacy for, ED clients. Service capacity to provide supervision was increased by high participant to Facilitator ratios (10 participants to one Facilitator and one Co-facilitator) and recruitment of external Facilitators. Respondents indicated they would recommend QuEDS FPS to other dietitians and 96% planned to continue with the program.
conclusionsQuEDS FPS program increases capacity to provide supervision with demonstrated positive impacts on dietitians' confidence and ability to deliver dietetic interventions in the ED arena and, by inference, the dietetic care of people with an ED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.