Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35787248›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2022

Machine learning approach for the prediction of 30-day mortality in patients with sepsis-associated encephalopathy.

Liwei Peng, Chi Peng, Fan Yang, Jian Wang, Wei Zuo, Chao Cheng, Zilong Mao, Zhichao Jin, Weixin Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Machine Learning and Clinical Predictors of Mortality in Cardiac Arrest Patients: A Comprehensive Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Liwei Peng *Department of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, No.1 Xinsi Road, Xi'an, 710038, China.
Chi Peng *Department of Health Statistics, Second Military Medical University, No. 800 Xiangyin Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Fan Yang *Institute of Pathology and Southwest Cancer Center, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China.
Jian WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, No.1 Xinsi Road, Xi'an, 710038, China.
Wei ZuoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, No.1 Xinsi Road, Xi'an, 710038, China.
Chao ChengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, No.1 Xinsi Road, Xi'an, 710038, China.
Zilong MaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, No.1 Xinsi Road, Xi'an, 710038, China.
Zhichao JinDepartment of Health Statistics, Second Military Medical University, No. 800 Xiangyin Road, Shanghai, 200433, China. jinzhichao@smmu.edu.cn.
Weixin LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, No.1 Xinsi Road, Xi'an, 710038, China. tangdunaowai@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOur study aimed to identify predictors as well as develop machine learning (ML) models to predict the risk of 30-day mortality in patients with sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE). MATERIALS AND

methodsML models were developed and validated based on a public database named Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV. Models were compared by the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and Hosmer-Lemeshow good of fit test.

resultsOf 6994 patients in MIMIC-IV included in the final cohort, a total of 1232 (17.62%) patients died following SAE. Recursive feature elimination (RFE) selected 15 variables, including acute physiology score III (APSIII), Glasgow coma score (GCS), sepsis related organ failure assessment (SOFA), Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), red blood cell volume distribution width (RDW), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), age, respiratory rate, PaO

conclusionsThe ML models, as demonstrated by our study, can be used to evaluate the prognosis of SAE patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Online calculator could facilitate the sharing of predictive models.

Indexed as

SepsisSepsis-Associated EncephalopathyDeathHumansMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerMachine learningModel interpretationSAESepsis-associated encephalopathyWeb-based calculator

Identifiers

PMID35787248
PMCPMC9252033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.