Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35787056›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Comparing human and chimpanzee temporal lobe neuroanatomy reveals modifications to human language hubs beyond the frontotemporal arcuate fasciculus.

Joanna Sierpowska, Katherine L Bryant, Nikki Janssen, Guilherme Blazquez Freches, Manon Römkens, Margot Mangnus, Rogier B Mars, Vitoria Piai

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evolution of Glutamate Metabolism viaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The uniqueness of the human brain: a review.Dementia & neuropsychologia · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Joanna SierpowskaDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, 6500 GL Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5991-6916
Katherine L BryantDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, 6500 GL Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1045-4543
Nikki JanssenDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, 6500 GL Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Guilherme Blazquez FrechesDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, 6500 GL Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Manon RömkensDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, 6500 GL Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Margot MangnusDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, 6500 GL Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5531-4507
Rogier B MarsDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, 6500 GL Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Vitoria PiaiDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, 6500 GL Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4860-5952
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council 203129/Z/16/ZBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N019814/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biological foundation for the language-ready brain in the human lineage remains a debated subject. In humans, the arcuate fasciculus (AF) white matter and the posterior portions of the middle temporal gyrus are crucial for language. Compared with other primates, the human AF has been shown to dramatically extend into the posterior temporal lobe, which forms the basis of a number of models of the structural connectivity basis of language. Recent advances in both language research and comparative neuroimaging invite a reassessment of the anatomical differences in language streams between humans and our closest relatives. Here, we show that posterior temporal connectivity via the AF in humans compared with chimpanzees is expanded in terms of its connectivity not just to the ventral frontal cortex but also to the parietal cortex. At the same time, posterior temporal regions connect more strongly to the ventral white matter in chimpanzees as opposed to humans. This pattern is present in both brain hemispheres. Additionally, we show that the anterior temporal lobe harbors a combination of connections present in both species through the inferior fronto-occipital fascicle and human-unique expansions through the uncinate and middle and inferior longitudinal fascicles. These findings elucidate structural changes that are unique to humans and may underlie the anatomical foundations for full-fledged language capacity.

Indexed as

White MatterAnimalsBrain MappingHumansLanguageNeural PathwaysNeuroanatomyPan troglodytesTemporal Lobearcuate fasciculusevolutionlanguagetemporal lobewhite matter

Identifiers

PMID35787056
PMCPMC9282369
OpenAlexW4283823661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.