ArticleResearch integrity and peer review2022
Improving equity, diversity, and inclusion in academia.
Article in Research integrity and peer review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Inequities in glaucoma research: an analysis of Cochrane systematic reviews and randomized trials.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2025Pooled it
- A systematic analysis of the gender disparities in oncology journal editorial boards.Research integrity and peer review · 2026Article
- Addressing global health equity through Global Collaborative Evidence Networks: a narrative literature review of governance models, power and participation.Globalization and health · 2026Review
- Perceptions of Arab researchers regarding publishing scientific research: A cross-sectional study.Accountability in research · 2026Article
- Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Biomedical Research and Publishing.Indian journal of psychological medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Teaching medical terminology: comparing the effectiveness of lecture-based and corpus-assisted methods.BMC research notes · 2025Article
- A Survey Study To Assess the Diversity and Inclusion in Nephrology Journal Editorial Leadership.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2025Article
- AI in peer review: can artificial intelligence be an ally in reducing gender and geographical gaps in peer review? A randomized trial.Research integrity and peer review · 2025Article
- Improving the reporting on health equity in observational research (STROBE-Equity): extension checklist and elaboration.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Article
- Priorities and expectations of researchers, funders, patients and the public regarding equity in medical research and funding: results from the PERSPECT qualitative study.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- [How to Achieve Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in The Korean Society of Gastroenterology?]The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2025Review
- Equality and diversity in research: building an inclusive future.BMC research notes · 2025Article
- Article
- A Keynote Address: A Guide to Supporting Conference Speakers with Lived Experience of Cleft Lip and/or Palate.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2025Article
- Enhancing Equity in Clinical Research: A Multifaceted Proposal for Spondyloarthritis.The Journal of rheumatology · 2024Article
- Journal editing and peer review in the international setting.Radiology advances · 2024Article
- Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion on Editorial Boards of Medical Student Journals.Asian bioethics review · 2024Article
- How to be a good reviewer: A step-by-step guide for approaching peer review of a scientific manuscript.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are growing bodies of evidence demonstrating the benefits of equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) on academic and organizational excellence. In turn, some editors have stated their desire to improve the EDI of their journals and of the wider scientific community. The Royal Society of Chemistry established a minimum set of requirements aimed at improving EDI in scholarly publishing. Additionally, several resources were reported to have the potential to improve EDI, but their effectiveness and feasibility are yet to be determined. In this commentary we suggest six approaches, based on the Royal Society of Chemistry set of requirements, that journals could implement to improve EDI. They are: (1) adopt a journal EDI statement with clear, actionable steps to achieve it; (2) promote the use of inclusive and bias-free language; (3) appoint a journal's EDI director or lead; (4) establish a EDI mentoring approach; (5) monitor adherence to EDI principles; and (6) publish reports on EDI actions and achievements. We also provide examples of journals that have implemented some of these strategies, and discuss the roles of peer reviewers, authors, researchers, academic institutes, and funders in improving EDI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.