Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35786442›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

Therapeutic deep brain stimulation disrupts movement-related subthalamic nucleus activity in parkinsonian mice.

Jonathan S Schor, Isabelle Gonzalez Montalvo, Perry W E Spratt, Rea J Brakaj, Jasmine A Stansil, Emily L Twedell, Kevin J Bender, Alexandra B Nelson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Synaptic integration and competition in the substantia nigra pars reticulata-An experimental and in silico analysis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jonathan S SchorNeuroscience Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2806-8782
Isabelle Gonzalez MontalvoNeuroscience Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.
Perry W E SprattNeuroscience Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.
Rea J BrakajKavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, United States.
Jasmine A StansilKavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, United States.
Emily L TwedellNeuroscience Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.
Kevin J BenderNeuroscience Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7084-1532
Alexandra B NelsonNeuroscience Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9305-5662

Funding

Predoctoral Training in NeurobiologyT32NS115706 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SAMUEL JEREMY PLEASURE · 2020 to 2026
$3.4M
Striatal Mechanisms of Levodopa-Induced DyskinesiaR01NS101354 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Alexandra Nelson · 2018 to 2026
$3.3M
Optogenetic dissection of striatal circuits in a mouse model of human dystoniaK08NS081001 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI NELSON, ALEXANDRA · 2012 to 2016
$858k
Dissecting Mechanisms of Deep Brain Stimulation through a Novel Mouse ModelF31NS110329 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SCHOR, JONATHAN · 2019 to 2019
$24k
NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS110329NINDS NIH HHS K08 NS081001NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS101354NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS115706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) relieves many motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD), but its underlying therapeutic mechanisms remain unclear. Since its advent, three major theories have been proposed: (1) DBS inhibits the STN and basal ganglia output; (2) DBS antidromically activates motor cortex; and (3) DBS disrupts firing dynamics within the STN. Previously, stimulation-related electrical artifacts limited mechanistic investigations using electrophysiology. We used electrical artifact-free GCaMP fiber photometry to investigate activity in basal ganglia nuclei during STN DBS in parkinsonian mice. To test whether the observed changes in activity were sufficient to relieve motor symptoms, we then combined electrophysiological recording with targeted optical DBS protocols. Our findings suggest that STN DBS exerts its therapeutic effect through the disruption of movement-related STN activity, rather than inhibition or antidromic activation. These results provide insight into optimizing PD treatments and establish an approach for investigating DBS in other neuropsychiatric conditions.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationMotor CortexParkinson DiseaseSubthalamic NucleusAnimalsMiceMovementbasal gangliacalcium imagingdeep brain stimulationelectrophysiologymouseneuroscienceParkinson's diseasesubthalamic nucleus

Identifiers

PMID35786442
PMCPMC9342952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.