Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35786399›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2022

COVID-19 vaccination efficacy in numbers including SARS-CoV-2 variants and age comparison: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Marharyta Sobczak, Rafał Pawliczak

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Neurovascular Adverse Effects of Sars-Cov-2 Vaccination.Drug design, development and therapy · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marharyta SobczakDepartment of Immunopathology, Faculty of Medicine, Division of Biomedical Science, Medical University of Lodz, st. Zeligowskiego 7/9, 90-752, Lodz, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2244-7730
Rafał PawliczakDepartment of Immunopathology, Faculty of Medicine, Division of Biomedical Science, Medical University of Lodz, st. Zeligowskiego 7/9, 90-752, Lodz, Poland. rafal.pawliczak@csk.umed.lodz.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6784-453X

Funding

Uniwersytet Medyczny w Lodzi 503/0-149-03/503-01-001-19-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNew vaccines are being developed to fight the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. In our study we compared the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines to prevent COVID-19-related infections and mortality.

methods17 randomized clinical trials of COVID-19 vaccines were included after search in databases. We compared COVID-19 vaccines based on symptomatic and severe infections, number of deaths and hospitalizations related to COVID-19. Also, we analyzed the efficacy of COVID-19 against different variants of SARS-CoV-2 as well as according to different age groups. Random effects model using Mantel-Haenzeal method was used to pool relative risk (RR).

resultsOur meta-analysis shows that full vaccination could decrease not only the risk of symptomatic or severe COVID-19, the risk of hospitalization and death caused by COVID-19. COVID-19 vaccines were also effective against variants of SARS-CoV-2 (RR = 0.36; 95% CI [0.25; 0.53], p < 0.0001). However, efficacy of vaccination varied in COVID-19 variant-dependent manner. Moreover, the analysis in different age groups showed that COVID-19 vaccines had the similar results: the risk was slightly lower in adults compared to elderly cohort [Formula: see text] 65 years): (RR = 0.16, 95% CI [0.11; 0.23]) and (RR = 0.19, 95% CI [0.12; 0.30]), respectively.

conclusionsData obtained from clinical trials of COVID-19 vaccines looks promising, in order to fully investigate efficacy of the vaccines further clinical examination is required especially considering new SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Indexed as

COVID-19Viral VaccinesAdultAgedCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansPandemicsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSARS-CoV-2VaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesViral VaccinesCoronavirus infectionCOVID-19Meta-analysisSARS-CoV-2Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID35786399
PMCPMC9250750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.