ReviewTrends in cognitive sciences2022
Readiness to remember: predicting variability in episodic memory.
Review in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- eyeris: A Flexible, Extensible, and Reproducible Pupillometry Preprocessing Framework in R.Psychophysiology · 2026Article
- The impact of thought probes and other encoding interruptions on memory.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2026Article
- Hippocampal patterns and associative memory: Distinct intracranial EEG temporal encoding patterns support memory.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- From Sensory Details to Verbal Codes: Visual Memory Reinstatement of Location and Color Features.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Strong mnemonic prediction errors increase cognitive control, attention, and arousal.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The impact of category-based retro-cues on representational prioritization in visual working memory: behavioral and EEG evidence.Psychological research · 2025Article
- Age-related differences in the relationship between sustained attention and associative memory and Memory-Guided inference.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2025Article
- Predicting long-term memory via pupillometry.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Brain mechanisms underlying the inhibitory control of thought.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2025Review
- Non-Target Suppression Supports the Formation of Representational Prioritization Under High Working Memory Load.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Attending to Remember: Recent Advances in Methods and Theory.Current directions in psychological science · 2025Article
- Neural state changes during movie watching relate to episodic memory in younger and older adults.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Article
- Memory augmentation with an adaptive cognitive interface.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025Article
- Event Segmentation Promotes the Reorganization of Emotional Memory.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2025Article
- Decoding the neural dynamics of everyday prospective remembering: a hidden Markov model approach.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Episodic memory without autonoetic consciousness.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Decoding episodic autobiographical memory in naturalistic virtual reality.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Pupillary correlates of individual differences in n-back task performance.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024Article
- The Relation Between Attention and Memory.Annual review of psychology · 2024Review
- No evidence that visual impulses enhance the readout of retrieved long-term memory contents from EEG activity.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Learning and remembering are fundamental to our lives, so what causes us to forget? Answers often highlight preparatory processes that precede learning, as well as mnemonic processes during the act of encoding or retrieval. Importantly, evidence now indicates that preparatory processes that precede retrieval attempts also have powerful influences on memory success or failure. Here, we review recent work from neuroimaging, electroencephalography, pupillometry, and behavioral science to propose an integrative framework of retrieval-period dynamics that explains variance in remembering in the moment and across individuals as a function of interactions among preparatory attention, goal coding, and mnemonic processes. Extending this approach, we consider how a 'readiness to remember' (R2R) framework explains variance in high-level functions of memory and mnemonic disruptions in aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.