Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35786140›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of STD & AIDS2022

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence for community-based HIV testing on men's engagement in the HIV care cascade.

Allison K Groves, Petra Stankard, Sarah L Bowler, Muhammad S Jamil, Luwam T Gebrekristos, Patrick D Smith, Caitlin Quinn, Ndoungou Salla Ba, Thato Chidarikire, Van Thi Thuy Nguyen and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of STD & AIDS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Allison K GrovesDornsife School of Public Health, 37412Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Petra StankardIndependent Consultant, Washington, DC, USA.
Sarah L BowlerDornsife School of Public Health, 37412Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Muhammad S JamilDepartment of HIV/AIDS, 3489World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Luwam T GebrekristosDornsife School of Public Health, 37412Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Patrick D SmithDornsife School of Public Health, 37412Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1438-989X
Caitlin QuinnDepartment of HIV/AIDS, 3489World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ndoungou Salla BaDepartment of HIV/AIDS, 3489World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Thato ChidarikireHIV Prevention Programmes, National Department of Health, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Van Thi Thuy NguyenDepartment of HIV/AIDS, 3489World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8766-3082
Rachel BaggaleyDepartment of HIV/AIDS, 3489World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Cheryl JohnsonDepartment of HIV/AIDS, 3489World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
World Health Organization · CHDrexel University · USIndependent Sector · USNational Health Laboratory Service · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMen with HIV are less likely than women to know their status, be on antiretroviral therapy, and be virally suppressed. This review examined men's community-based HIV testing services (CB-HTS) outcomes.

designSystematic review and meta-analysis.

methodsWe searched seven databases and conference abstracts through July 2018. We estimated pooled proportions and/or risk ratios (for meta-analyses) for each outcome using random effects models.

results188 studies met inclusion criteria. Common testing models included targeted outreach (e.g. mobile testing), home-based testing, and testing at stand-alone community sites. Across 25 studies reporting uptake, 81% (CI: 75-86%) of men offered testing accepted it. Uptake was higher among men reached through CB-HTS than facility-based HTS (RR = 1.39; CI: 1.13-1.71). Over 69% (CI: 64-71%) of those tested through CB-HTS were men, across 184 studies. Across studies reporting new HIV-positivity among men (

conclusionCB-HTS is an important strategy for reaching undiagnosed men with HIV from the general population and key population groups, particularly using targeted outreach models. When compared to facility-based HIV testing services, men tested through CB-HTS are more likely to uptake testing, and nearly all men who tested positive through CB-HTS were newly diagnosed. Linkage to care may be a challenge following CB-HTS, and greater efforts and research are needed to effectively implement testing strategies that facilitate rapid ART initiation and linkage to prevention services.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsMass ScreeningFemaleHIV TestingHumansMaleCommunitygenderHIV care continuumHIV preventionmen who have sex with mentesting

Identifiers

PMID35786140
PMCPMC9660288
OpenAlexW4283790161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.