Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35785971›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American Heart Association2022

Highlights in ASCVD Primary Prevention for 2021.

Tamar S Polonsky, Amit Khera, Michael D Miedema, Douglas D Schocken, Peter W F Wilson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tamar S PolonskyDepartment of Medicine University of Chicago Medicine Chicago IL.ORCID 0000-0003-2112-9244
Amit KheraDepartment of Medicine University of Texas, Southwestern Dallas TX.ORCID 0000-0001-7255-6874
Michael D MiedemaAllina Health Minneapolis MN.
Douglas D SchockenDepartment of Medicine Duke University Durham NC.
Peter W F WilsonDepartment of Medicine Emory University Atlanta GA.ORCID 0000-0002-5653-7056

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review examines key studies published in 2021 that are related to primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Major randomized clinical trials (RCTs) concerning traditional risk factors or ASCVD events, meta-analyses, and key observational studies related to primary prevention of ASCVD were considered. The review includes interventions for weight loss, cardiometabolic and renal disease, blood pressure control, diet, and the occurrence of cardiovascular disease events. A few studies considered both primary and secondary prevention populations. The review is not exhaustive. We did not include studies that focused on heart failure or clinical presentations that may be difficult to classify, such as acute or chronic ischemic cardiovascular disease without myocardial infarction. Our purpose was to highlight recent research that will help the reader stay abreast of the changing field of cardiovascular prevention.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisCardiovascular DiseasesHumansPrimary PreventionRisk FactorsSecondary Preventiondiabeteshypertensionobesityprimary preventionrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID35785971
PMCPMC9333377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.