Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35785523›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2022

Interpretable Machine Learning Models to Predict the Resistance of Breast Cancer Patients to Doxorubicin from Their microRNA Profiles.

Adeolu Z Ogunleye, Chayanit Piyawajanusorn, Anthony Gonçalves, Ghita Ghislat, Pedro J Ballester

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Adeolu Z OgunleyeCancer Research Center of Marseille (CRCM), INSERM U1068, Marseille, F-13009, France.
Chayanit PiyawajanusornCancer Research Center of Marseille (CRCM), INSERM U1068, Marseille, F-13009, France.
Anthony GonçalvesCancer Research Center of Marseille (CRCM), INSERM U1068, Marseille, F-13009, France.
Ghita GhislatCancer Research Center of Marseille (CRCM), INSERM U1068, Marseille, F-13009, France.
Pedro J BallesterCancer Research Center of Marseille (CRCM), INSERM U1068, Marseille, F-13009, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4078-743X
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

Indo-French Centre for the Promotion of Advanced Research - CEFIPRAPetroleum Technology Development Fund (PTDF), Nigeria
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Doxorubicin is a common treatment for breast cancer. However, not all patients respond to this drug, which sometimes causes life-threatening side effects. Accurately anticipating doxorubicin-resistant patients would therefore permit to spare them this risk while considering alternative treatments without delay. Stratifying patients based on molecular markers in their pretreatment tumors is a promising approach to advance toward this ambitious goal, but single-gene gene markers such as HER2 expression have not shown to be sufficiently predictive. The recent availability of matched doxorubicin-response and diverse molecular profiles across breast cancer patients permits now analysis at a much larger scale. 16 machine learning algorithms and 8 molecular profiles are systematically evaluated on the same cohort of patients. Only 2 of the 128 resulting models are substantially predictive, showing that they can be easily missed by a standard-scale analysis. The best model is classification and regression tree (CART) nonlinearly combining 4 selected miRNA isoforms to predict doxorubicin response (median Matthew correlation coefficient (MCC) and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.56 and 0.80, respectively). By contrast, HER2 expression is significantly less predictive (median MCC and AUC of 0.14 and 0.57, respectively). As the predictive accuracy of this CART model increases with larger training sets, its update with future data should result in even better accuracy.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMicroRNAsAlgorithmsDoxorubicinFemaleHumansMachine LearningDoxorubicinMicroRNAsartificial intelligencemachine learningmultiomicsprecision oncologytumor profiling

Identifiers

PMID35785523
PMCPMC9403644
OpenAlexW4283797918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.