Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35785407›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2022

A vaping risks education program for school students: Evaluation of the solve mystery toolkit.

Asha Hollis, Emily Downey, Shaelene Standing, Janet Leahy, Kirsten Ebbert, Aravind Ganesh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Asha HollisCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Emily DowneyCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Shaelene StandingCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Janet LeahyDepartment of Computer Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Kirsten EbbertDepartment of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary AB, Canada.
Aravind GaneshDepartments of Clinical Neurosciences and Community Health Sciences, and the Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One in three grade 7 to 12 students in Canada report trying vaping or e-cigarettes. Despite consequences like nicotine addiction, impaired brain development, increased respiratory symptoms, and association with an increased risk of COVID-19 diagnosis, 48% of youth believe occasional vaping has little to no risk. There is a clear need for youth to learn about vaping consequences. We developed and piloted a novel free interactive educational program on vaping risks which has been used by over 800 grade 7 to 9 students. In post-program surveys, students reported a subjective increase in knowledge about the health consequences of vaping.

Indexed as

AddictionChildrenE-cigarettesNicotineVapingYouth

Identifiers

PMID35785407
PMCPMC9243163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.