Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35785392›Full record

ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2022

Artificial intelligence to detect abnormal heart rhythm from scanned electrocardiogram tracings.

Joshua Bridge, Lu Fu, Weidong Lin, Yumei Xue, Gregory Y H Lip, Yalin Zheng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Joshua BridgeDepartment of Eye and Vision Science, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences University of Liverpool Liverpool UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8798-4134
Lu FuDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences Guangzhou China.
Weidong LinDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences Guangzhou China.
Yumei XueDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences Guangzhou China.
Gregory Y H LipLiverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science University of Liverpool and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital Liverpool UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7566-1626
Yalin ZhengDepartment of Eye and Vision Science, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences University of Liverpool Liverpool UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7873-0922
Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences · CNUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation is an integral part of the clinical ECG workflow; however, this process is often time-consuming and labor-intensive. We aim to develop a rapid, inexpensive means to detect abnormal ECGs using artificial intelligence (AI) from scanned ECG printouts. Methods: The study included 1172 12-lead ECG scans performed in 1172 individuals from a community in Guangzhou, China; 878 (74.9%) were diagnosed with sinus rhythm, and the remaining 294 (25.1%) with abnormal rhythms. A deep learning model consisting of a convolutional neural network based on InceptionV3 and a fully connected layer followed by a GEV activation was trained to classify scanned tracings as either normal or abnormal. Results: In a hold-out testing set, the model achieved a area under curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 0.932 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.890, 0.976), 0.816 (95% CI: 0.657, 0.923), 0.993 (95% CI: 0.959, 1.0), 0.969 (95% CI: 0.838, 0.999), and 0.950 (95% CI: 0.90, 0.980) respectively, when using a probability threshold of 0.5. When compared with a physiological expert, these results show comparable performance with a statistically significant increase in specificity and a non-significant decrease in sensitivity at the 95% level. Conclusions: We have developed a rapid, inexpensive, accurate means to detect abnormal ECGs using AI. Easy and accurate identification of such "abnormal" ECGs could allow the mass automated review of ECGs in community settings where abnormal ones could be flagged using AI for detailed clinical review by healthcare professionals.

Indexed as

deep learningECGscreening

Identifiers

PMID35785392
PMCPMC9237304
OpenAlexW4220817151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.