ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2022
Artificial intelligence to detect abnormal heart rhythm from scanned electrocardiogram tracings.
Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence for Arrhythmia Detection Using the 12-Lead Electrocardiogram: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Interpretable arrhythmia detection in ECG scans using deep learning ensembles: a genetic programming approach.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- GenECG: a synthetic image-based ECG dataset to augment artificial intelligence-enhanced algorithm development.BMJ health & care informatics · 2025Article
- Future Use of AI in Diagnostic Medicine: 2-Wave Cross-Sectional Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- The Role of ChatGPT in the Advancement of Diagnosis, Management, and Prognosis of Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Interpretable Machine Learning Techniques in ECG-Based Heart Disease Classification: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Artificial intelligence to detect abnormal heart rhythm from scanned electrocardiogram tracings.Journal of arrhythmia · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation is an integral part of the clinical ECG workflow; however, this process is often time-consuming and labor-intensive. We aim to develop a rapid, inexpensive means to detect abnormal ECGs using artificial intelligence (AI) from scanned ECG printouts. Methods: The study included 1172 12-lead ECG scans performed in 1172 individuals from a community in Guangzhou, China; 878 (74.9%) were diagnosed with sinus rhythm, and the remaining 294 (25.1%) with abnormal rhythms. A deep learning model consisting of a convolutional neural network based on InceptionV3 and a fully connected layer followed by a GEV activation was trained to classify scanned tracings as either normal or abnormal. Results: In a hold-out testing set, the model achieved a area under curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 0.932 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.890, 0.976), 0.816 (95% CI: 0.657, 0.923), 0.993 (95% CI: 0.959, 1.0), 0.969 (95% CI: 0.838, 0.999), and 0.950 (95% CI: 0.90, 0.980) respectively, when using a probability threshold of 0.5. When compared with a physiological expert, these results show comparable performance with a statistically significant increase in specificity and a non-significant decrease in sensitivity at the 95% level. Conclusions: We have developed a rapid, inexpensive, accurate means to detect abnormal ECGs using AI. Easy and accurate identification of such "abnormal" ECGs could allow the mass automated review of ECGs in community settings where abnormal ones could be flagged using AI for detailed clinical review by healthcare professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.