Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35785381›Full record

ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2022

The efficacy of posterior wall isolation in atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Chanavuth Kanitsoraphan, Pattara Rattanawong, Chol Techorueangwiwat, Jakrin Kewcharoen, Raktham Mekritthikrai, Narut Prasitlumkum, Parthav Shah, Hicham El Masry

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effect of fibrosis regionality on atrial fibrillation recurrence: insights from DECAAF II.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. How to ablate the septo-pulmonary bundle: a case-based review of percutaneous ablation strategies to achieve roof line block.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Chanavuth KanitsoraphanUniversity of Hawaii Internal Medicine Residency Program Honolulu Hawaii USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8222-550X
Pattara RattanawongDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Phoenix Arizona USA.
Chol TechorueangwiwatUniversity of Hawaii Internal Medicine Residency Program Honolulu Hawaii USA.
Jakrin KewcharoenDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology Loma Linda University Medical Center Loma Linda California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0959-5576
Raktham MekritthikraiDivision of Cardiology Cook County Hospital Cook Illinois USA.
Narut PrasitlumkumDepartment of cardiology University of California Riverside Riverside California USA.
Parthav ShahUniversity of Hawaii Internal Medicine Residency Program Honolulu Hawaii USA.
Hicham El MasryDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Phoenix Arizona USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2470-2862
University of Hawaii System · USWinnMed · USJohn H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County · USLoma Linda University Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Riverside · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Posterior wall isolation (PWI) is an emerging approach in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, yet its efficacy remains controversial. This is the first meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) to evaluate the efficacy of PWI in AF ablation. Objective: To assess the efficacy of PWI in reducing atrial arrhythmia recurrence following initial AF ablation at long-term follow-ups when compared to conventional methods. Methods: We conducted a literature search from inception through September 2021 in EMBASE and MEDLINE databases. We included RCTs that compared outcomes in PWI and conventional approaches of AF ablation. Data from each study were combined using the random-effects, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird to calculate odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Eight RCT from 2009 to 2020, including 1024 AF patients, were included. PWI did not decrease overall atrial arrhythmias recurrence (RR 0.96, 95% CI:0.88-1.05, Conclusion: Our study suggests that adding PWI significantly decreased AF recurrence in patients with persistent AF compared to controlled approaches. It highlights the importance of considering PWI during the initial procedure in this patient population.

Identifiers

PMID35785381
PMCPMC9237313
OpenAlexW4220924199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.