Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35785245›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in hematology2022

Real-world effectiveness and safety analysis of carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone and carfilzomib-dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a multicenter retrospective analysis.

Yoshiyuki Onda, Junya Kanda, Hitomi Kaneko, Yuji Shimura, Shin-Ichi Fuchida, Aya Nakaya, Tomoki Itou, Ryosuke Yamamura, Hirokazu Tanaka, Hirohiko Shibayama and 18 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in hematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Lenalidomide use in multiple myeloma (Review).Molecular and clinical oncology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 17 institutions in 1 country.

Yoshiyuki OndaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3093-4974
Junya KandaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawaharacho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6704-3633
Hitomi KanekoDepartment of Hematology, Osaka Red Cross Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Yuji ShimuraDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Shin-Ichi FuchidaDepartment of Hematology, Japan Community Health care Organization Kyoto Kuramaguchi Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.
Aya NakayaDivision of Hematology, First Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Tomoki ItouDivision of Hematology, First Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Ryosuke YamamuraDepartment of Hematology, Osaka Saiseikai Nakatsu Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Hirokazu TanakaDepartment of Hematology and Rheumatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Hirohiko ShibayamaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Yutaka ShimazuDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1604-7220
Hitoji UchiyamaDepartment of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daiichi Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Satoshi YoshiharaDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
Yoko AdachiDepartment of Internal Medicine, JCHO Kobe Central Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.
Mitsuhiro MatsudaDepartment of Hematology, PL General Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Hitoshi HanamotoDepartment of Hematology, Kinki University Nara Hospital, Nara, Japan.
Nobuhiko UoshimaDepartment of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daini Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Satoru KosugiDepartment of Internal Medicine (Hematology), Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Kensuke OhtaHematology Ohta Clinic, Osaka, Japan.
Hideo YagiDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center, Nara, Japan.
Yuzuru KanakuraSumitomo Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Itaru MatsumuraDepartment of Hematology and Rheumatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Masayuki HinoDepartment of Hematology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan.
Shosaku NomuraDivision of Hematology, First Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Chihiro ShimazakiDepartment of Hematology, Japan Community Health care Organization Kyoto Kuramaguchi Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.
Akifumi Takaori-KondoDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Junya KurodaDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Kansai Myeloma Forum
Kyoto University · JPKansai Medical University · JPKindai University · JPKyoto Medical Center · JPKyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JPHyogo Medical University · JPJapanese Red Cross Society Kyoto Daini Hospital · JPKobe Central Hospital · JPKyoto first Red Cross hospital · JPNara Prefecture General Medical CenterOsaka City University · JPOsaka Nishi Clinic · JPOsaka Red Cross Hospital · JPSaiseikai Nakatsu Hospital · JPSumitomo Hospital · JPThe University of Osaka · JPToyonaka Municipal Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the real-world survival benefits and safety profiles of carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRd) and carfilzomib-dexamethasone (Kd). Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis to evaluate their efficacy and safety in 157 patients registered in the Kansai Myeloma Forum database. Results: A total of 107 patients received KRd. Before KRd, 99% of patients had received bortezomib (54% were refractory disease), and 82% had received lenalidomide (57% were refractory disease). The overall response rate (ORR) was 68.2%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 8.8 and 29.3 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that reduction of the carfilzomib dose and non-IgG M protein were significantly associated with lower PFS and reduction of the carfilzomib dose and refractoriness to prior bortezomib-based regimens were significantly associated with lower OS. A total of 50 patients received Kd. Before Kd, 96% of patients had received bortezomib (54% were refractory disease). The ORR was 62.0%. The median PFS and OS were 7.1 and 20.9 months, respectively. Based on the multivariate analysis, reduction of the carfilzomib dose and International Staging System Stage III (ISS III) were significantly associated with lower PFS. Grade III or higher adverse events were observed in 48% of KRd cases and 54% of Kd cases. Cardiovascular events, cytopenia, and infections were frequent, and 4 KRd patients died due to heart failure, arrhythmia, cerebral hemorrhage, and pneumonia. Conclusion: Our analysis showed that an adequate dose of carfilzomib is important for achieving the best survival benefits in a real-world setting. Adverse effects after KRd and Kd therapy should also be considered.

Indexed as

carfilzomibdexamethasoneKdKRdlenalidomidereal-world efficacy and safetyrelapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

Identifiers

PMID35785245
PMCPMC9240591
OpenAlexW4285124945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.