Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35785193›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2022

Neoadjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Where Do We Go?

Chenqi Wang, Guang Tan, Jie Zhang, Bin Fan, Yunlong Chen, Dan Chen, Lili Yang, Xiang Chen, Qingzhu Duan, Feiliyan Maimaiti and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07226154 (An Exosomal miRNA Based Predictive Model for Personalized Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Selection in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07226154 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

An Exosomal miRNA Based Predictive Model for Personalized Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Selection in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

TypeobservationalSponsorCity of Hope Medical CenterRan2024 to 2026Enrolled200ConditionsPancreatic Ductal AdenocarcinomaArmsSmall RNA sequencing, PRECEPT assay (qRT-PCR validation)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Chenqi WangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Guang TanDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Jie ZhangDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Bin FanDepartment of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Northwest University (Xi'an No. 1 Hospital), Xi'an, China.
Yunlong ChenDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Dan ChenDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Lili YangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Xiang ChenDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Qingzhu DuanDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Feiliyan MaimaitiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Jian DuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Zhikun LinDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Jiangning GuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Haifeng LuoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been on the rise in recent years; however, its clinical diagnosis and treatment remain challenging. Although surgical resection remains the only chance for long-term patient survival, the likelihood of initial resectability is no higher than 20%. Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in PDAC aims to transform the proportion of inoperable PDACs into operable cases and reduce the likelihood of recurrence to improve overall survival. Ongoing phase 3 clinical trial aims to validate the role of NAT in PDAC therapy, including prolongation of survival, increased R0 resection, and a higher proportion of negative lymph nodes. Controversies surrounding the role of NAT in PDAC treatment include applicability to different stages of PDAC, chemotherapy regimens, radiation, duration of treatment, and assessment of effect. This review aims to summarize the current progress and controversies of NAT in PDAC.

Indexed as

borderline resectableFOLFIRINOXgemcitabinlocally advancedneoadjuvant chemoradiotherapyneoadjuvant chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID35785193
PMCPMC9245892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.