ReviewJournal of gynecologic surgery2022
Safety and Efficacy of Supradiaphragmatic Lymph Node Dissection in Advanced Ovarian Cancer.
Review in Journal of gynecologic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Postoperative gross residual disease after cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer impacts patient survival negatively. Specifically, unresected enlarged, metastatic supradiaphragmatic lymph nodes (SDLNs) may worsen progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Multiple studies have shown that upper abdominal debulking during primary cytoreductive surgery improves survival outcomes, but the evidence for resection of SDLN metastasis is less definitive. This review focuses on the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of SDLN resection for metastatic disease in advanced-stage ovarian cancer and explores emerging data on survival outcomes. Materials and Methods: A literature review from January 2004 to December 2021 identified 4 relevant studies, all published after 2016. Eligible studies included patients with advanced ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer who had undergone SDLN resection using a transdiaphragmatic approach or video-assisted thorascopy, and had evaluated SDLN dissection for diagnoses and treatment or assessed the benefits of SDLN resection as it relates to prognosis. Results: All 4 studies demonstrated the feasibility and safety of SDLN resection. Three of the studies reported a low intrathoracic recurrence rate after intrathoracic debulking. Cowan et al. described an impressive median PFS and OS of 17.2 months and 70.1 months, respectively, in patients who had undergone SDLN resection. Conclusions: Resection of enlarged SDLNs in carefully selected patients has the potential to confirm intrathoracic disease spread, help achieve maximal cytoreduction without delaying adjuvant treatment, and improve survival. More studies are needed to quantify the survival benefit of SDLN resection. (J GYNECOL SURG 38:202).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.