Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35785059›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Breast Cancer Classification Using FCN and Beta Wavelet Autoencoder.

Hussah Nasser AlEisa, Wajdi Touiti, Amel Ali ALHussan, Najib Ben Aoun, Ridha Ejbali, Mourad Zaied, Ayesha Saadia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hussah Nasser AlEisaDepartment of Computer Sciences, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8813-1050
Wajdi TouitiResearch Team in Intelligent Machines, National School of Engineers of Gabes, B. P. W 6072, Gabes, Tunisia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6157-7186
Amel Ali ALHussanDepartment of Computer Sciences, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7530-7961
Najib Ben AounCollege of Computer Science and Information Technology, Al Baha University, Al Baha, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9444-8209
Ridha EjbaliResearch Team in Intelligent Machines, National School of Engineers of Gabes, B. P. W 6072, Gabes, Tunisia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8148-1621
Mourad ZaiedResearch Team in Intelligent Machines, National School of Engineers of Gabes, B. P. W 6072, Gabes, Tunisia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4013-5834
Ayesha SaadiaDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computing and Artificial Intelligence, Air University, PAF Complex, Islamabad, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9620-8647

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, a new classification approach of breast cancer based on Fully Convolutional Networks (FCNs) and Beta Wavelet Autoencoder (BWAE) is presented. FCN, as a powerful image segmentation model, is used to extract the relevant information from mammography images. It will identify the relevant zones to model while WAE is used to model the extracted information for these zones. In fact, WAE has proven its superiority to the majority of the features extraction approaches. The fusion of these two techniques have improved the feature extraction phase and this by keeping and modeling only the relevant and useful features for the identification and description of breast masses. The experimental results showed the effectiveness of our proposed method which has given very encouraging results in comparison with the states of the art approaches on the same mammographic image base. A precision rate of 94% for benign and 93% for malignant was achieved with a recall rate of 92% for benign and 95% for malignant. For the normal case, we were able to reach a rate of 100%.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMammography

Identifiers

PMID35785059
PMCPMC9246636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.