ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022
Clinical Study on the Application of Preserved Urethral Mucosa at the Prostatic Apex in Transurethral Plasmakinetic Resection of the Prostate.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06263049 (Ejaculatory Preserving Transurethral Resection of the Prostate.), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Ejaculatory Preserving Transurethral Resection of the Prostate.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immediate urinary continence after continence-preserving holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral plasmakinetic prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a single-center comparative cohort study.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Learning curve analysis of transurethral thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate with preserving urethral Mucosa at the prostatic apex.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Progressive pre-disconnection of urethral mucosal flap during transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of prostate improves postoperative urinary continence.Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the differences in the clinical efficacy, complications, and safety of transurethral plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PKRP) by the conventional approach versus the approach preserving the urethral mucosa at the prostatic apex in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods: A total of 90 patients with PKRP admitted to the First Hospital of Qinhuangdao from December 2018 to March 2021 were selected and divided into a control group (conventional PKRP, Results: The differences in the preoperative indicators, glandectomy quality, and glandectomy rate between the groups were not statistically significant ( Conclusion: Compared with conventional PKRP, PKRP with preserved urethral mucosa at the prostatic apex can lead to immediate urinary continence after catheter extraction, reduce intraoperative blood loss, and shorten the surgery time, thus improving the surgical efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.