Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35784653›Full record

ArticleCell reports methods2022

Microscopy-based single-cell proteomic profiling reveals heterogeneity in DNA damage response dynamics.

Pin-Rui Su, Li You, Cecile Beerens, Karel Bezstarosti, Jeroen Demmers, Martin Pabst, Roland Kanaar, Cheng-Chih Hsu, Miao-Ping Chien

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports methods, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Functional Single-Cell Proteomics: Technology and Biological Applications.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pin-Rui SuDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Li YouDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Cecile BeerensDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Karel BezstarostiProteomics Core Facility, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Jeroen DemmersProteomics Core Facility, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Martin PabstDepartment of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
Roland KanaarDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Cheng-Chih HsuDepartment of Chemistry, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Miao-Ping ChienDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLNational Taiwan University · TWDelft University of Technology · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell proteomics has the potential to decipher tumor heterogeneity, and a method like single-cell proteomics by mass spectrometry (SCoPE-MS) allows profiling several tens of single cells for >1,000 proteins per cell. This method, however, cannot link the proteome of individual cells with phenotypes of interest. Here, we developed a microscopy-based functional single-cell proteomic-profiling technology, called FUNpro, to address this. FUNpro enables screening, identification, and isolation of single cells of interest in a real-time fashion, even if the phenotypes are dynamic or the cells of interest are rare. We applied FUNpro to proteomically profile a newly identified small subpopulation of U2OS osteosarcoma cells displaying an abnormal, prolonged DNA damage response (DDR) after ionizing radiation (IR). With this, we identified the PDS5A protein contributing to the abnormal DDR dynamics and helping the cells survive after IR.

Indexed as

DNA DamageMicroscopyCell Cycle ProteinsProteomicsRadiation, IonizingCell Cycle Proteins53BP1DDR foci dynamicsDNA damage responsefunctional single-cell selectionPDS5Aphenotype-to-proteome linkingphototaggingsingle-cell proteomicstumor heterogeneityultrawide field-of-view optical microscope

Identifiers

PMID35784653
PMCPMC9243628
OpenAlexW4282542829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.