Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35784611›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease2022

Real-life short-term effectiveness of anti-osteoporotic treatments: a longitudinal cohort study.

Giovanni Adami, Irene Gavioli, Maurizio Rossini, Ombretta Viapiana, Giovanni Orsolini, Camilla Benini, Eugenia Bertoldo, Elena Fracassi, Davide Gatti, Angelo Fassio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. PTH1 receptor agonists for fracture risk: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Giovanni AdamiRheumatology Unit, University of Verona, Pz Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8915-0755
Irene GavioliRheumatology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Maurizio RossiniRheumatology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9692-2293
Ombretta ViapianaRheumatology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Giovanni OrsoliniRheumatology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Camilla BeniniRheumatology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Eugenia BertoldoRheumatology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Elena FracassiRheumatology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Davide GattiRheumatology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Angelo FassioRheumatology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Randomized clinical trials have shown that anti-osteoporotic treatments can increase bone mineral density (BMD) and reduce the incidence of fragility fractures. However, data on the real-life effectiveness of anti-osteoporotic medications are still scarce. Methods: We conducted a cohort study on women at high risk of fracture. We retrieved clinical and densitometric data from the DeFRA database, which derives from the DeFRA tool, a web-based fracture risk assessment tool. Multivariable Cox regression survival models were employed to analyze the effectiveness of different anti-osteoporotic drugs on fracture. In sensitivity analyses, we conducted 1:1 propensity score matching analyses. Results: Data on 50,862 women were available. Among these, 3574 individuals had at least two consecutive visits. The crude fracture rate was 91.9/1000 person-year for non-treated patients. The crude fracture rate in bisphosphonate users was 72.1/1000 person-year, in denosumab users was 58.2/1000 person-year, and in teriparatide users was 19.3/1000 person-year. Overall, we found that bisphosphonate use was associated with a 30% lower risk of fracture compared to no treatment [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50-0.98]. Treatment with denosumab and teriparatide were associated with 60% and 90% lower risk of fracture, respectively (aHR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.24-0.75 and aHR: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.01-0.70). Bisphosphonate use was associated with a lower risk of fracture only after 1 year of treatment. Conclusion: In conclusion, we found that all anti-osteoporotic medications considered in the study effectively reduced the risk of fracture in the real-life. The effect of bisphosphonate on fracture risk was apparent only after the first year of treatment. Our findings do not support the use of bisphosphonates in patients at imminent risk of fracture.

Indexed as

anabolicsbisphosphonatesdenosumabosteoporosisteriparatide

Identifiers

PMID35784611
PMCPMC9243369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.