Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35784590›Full record

ArticleJournal of circulating biomarkers

Characterization of extracellular vesicles isolated from different liquid biopsies of uveal melanoma patients.

Carmen Luz Pessuti, Deise Fialho Costa, Kleber S Ribeiro, Mohamed Abdouh, Thupten Tsering, Heloisa Nascimento, Alessandra G Commodaro, Allexya Affonso Antunes Marcos, Ana Claudia Torrecilhas, Rubens N Belfort and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of circulating biomarkers. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Carmen Luz PessutiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, Vision Institute, IPEPO, São Paulo - Brazil.
Deise Fialho CostaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, Vision Institute, IPEPO, São Paulo - Brazil.
Kleber S RibeiroDepartment of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, Vision Institute, IPEPO, São Paulo - Brazil.
Mohamed AbdouhCancer Research Program, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, Montreal, Quebec - Canada.
Thupten TseringCancer Research Program, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, Montreal, Quebec - Canada.
Heloisa NascimentoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, Vision Institute, IPEPO, São Paulo - Brazil.
Alessandra G CommodaroDepartment of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, Vision Institute, IPEPO, São Paulo - Brazil.
Allexya Affonso Antunes MarcosDepartment of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, Vision Institute, IPEPO, São Paulo - Brazil.
Ana Claudia TorrecilhasDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of São Paulo, Diadema, São Paulo - Brazil.
Rubens N BelfortDepartment of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, Vision Institute, IPEPO, São Paulo - Brazil.
Rubens BelfortDepartment of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, Vision Institute, IPEPO, São Paulo - Brazil.
Julia Valdemarin BurnierCancer Research Program, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, Montreal, Quebec - Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID35784590
PMCPMC9238429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.