Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35784573›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2022

Fertility Preservation and Restoration Options for Pre-Pubertal Male Cancer Patients: Current Approaches.

Elena Eugeni, Iva Arato, Rachele Del Sordo, Angelo Sidoni, Andrea Garolla, Alberto Ferlin, Riccardo Calafiore, Stefano Brancorsini, Francesca Mancuso, Giovanni Luca

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elena EugeniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Iva AratoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Rachele Del SordoDivision of Anatomic Pathology and Histology, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Angelo SidoniDivision of Anatomic Pathology and Histology, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Andrea GarollaUnit of Andrology and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Alberto FerlinUnit of Andrology and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Riccardo CalafioreDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Stefano BrancorsiniSection of Pathology (Terni), Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Francesca MancusoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Giovanni LucaDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
University of Perugia · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fertility preservation for prepubertal male patients undergoing gonadotoxic therapies, potentially depleting spermatogonial cells, is an expanding necessity, yet most of the feasible options are still in the experimental phase. We present our experience and a summary of current and novel possibilities regarding the different strategies to protect or restore fertility in young male patients, before proceeding with chemotherapy or radiotherapy for malignances or other diseases. Adult oncological patients should always be counselled to cryopreserve the semen before starting treatment, however this approach is not suitable for prepubertal boys, who aren't capable to produce sperm yet. Fortunately, since the survival rate of pediatric cancer patients has skyrocketed in the last decade and it's over 84%, safeguarding their future fertility is becoming a major concern for reproductive medicine. Surgical and medical approaches to personalize treatment or protect the gonads could be a valid first step to take. Testicular tissue autologous grafting or xenografting, and spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) transplantation, are the main experimental options available, but spermatogenesis

Indexed as

Fertility PreservationNeoplasmsAnimalsHumansMacaca mulattaMaleMiceRabbitsSemenSwineTestiscryopreservationde novo morphogenesis, In vitro spermatogenesisfertilitygonadotoxic cancer treatmentspermatogonial cellSSCs transplantationtesticular tissue transplantation

Identifiers

PMID35784573
PMCPMC9244702
OpenAlexW4283010134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.