Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35784432›Full record

ArticleForensic sciences research2022

Sex estimation in a Turkish population using Purkait's triangle: a virtual approach by 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT).

Julieta G García-Donas, Suna Ors, Ercan Inci, Elena F Kranioti, Oguzhan Ekizoglu, Negahnaz Moghaddam, Silke Grabherr

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic sciences research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Julieta G García-DonasCentre for Anatomy and Human Identification, School of Science and Engineering, University of Dundee, Scotland, UK.
Suna OrsDepartment of Radiology, Bakirkoy Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ercan InciDepartment of Radiology, Bakirkoy Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Elena F KraniotiDepartment of Forensic Science, University of Crete, Crete, Greece.
Oguzhan EkizogluUniversity Center of Legal Medicine Lausanne-Geneva, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0194-595X
Negahnaz MoghaddamUnit of Forensic Imaging and Anthropology, University Center of Legal Medicine Lausanne-Geneva, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Silke GrabherrUniversity Center of Legal Medicine Lausanne-Geneva, Lausanne, Switzerland.
University Centre of Legal Medicine · CHBakırköy Psychiatric Hospital · TRUniversity of Crete · GRUniversity of Dundee · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex estimation is considered one of the first steps in the forensic identification process. Morphological and morphometrical differences between males and females have been used as means for morphoscopic and metric methods on both cranial and postcranial skeletal elements. When dry skeletal elements are not available, virtual data can be used as a substitute. The present research explores 3-dimensional (3D) scans from a Turkish population to test a sex estimation method developed by Purkait (2005). Overall, 296 individuals were used in this study (158 males and 138 females). Purkait's triangle parameters were measured on computed tomography (CT) scans obtained from both right and left femora of each patient at the Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training Research Hospital (Istanbul, Turkey). Intra- and inter-observer errors were assessed for all variables through technical error of measurements analysis. Bilateral asymmetry and sex differences were evaluated using parametric and non-parametric statistical approaches. Univariate and multivariate discriminant function analyses were then conducted. Observer errors demonstrated an overall agreement within and between experts, as indicated by technical error of measurement (TEM) results. No bilateral asymmetries were reported, and all parameters demonstrated a statistically significant difference between males and females. Fourteen discriminant models were generated by applying single and combined parameters, producing a total correct sex classification ranging from 78.4% to 92.6%. In addition, over 67% of the total sample was accurately classified, with 95% or greater posterior probabilities. Our study demonstrates the feasibility of 3D sex estimation using Purkait's triangle on a Turkish population, with accuracy rates comparable to those reported in other populations. This is the first attempt to apply this method on virtual data and although further validation and standardisation are recommended for its application on dry bone, this research constitutes a significant contribution to the development of population-specific standards when only virtual data are available.Key pointsCT analysis using Purkait's triangle is a suitable tool for assessment of sex in unidentified individuals.The best overall estimation rate was achieved with the F11 model, with around 92% of accuracy.The results suggested 78.4% to 92.6% correct sex identification rates.More research is needed to expand the sample set and verify the results.

Indexed as

computed tomographyforensic anthropologyForensic sciencesPurkait’s trianglesex estimation

Identifiers

PMID35784432
PMCPMC9246024
OpenAlexW3157838756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.