Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35784429›Full record

ArticleForensic sciences research2022

Isolation and identification of an isomeric sildenafil analogue as an adulterant in an instant coffee premix.

Ahmad Yusri Mohd Yusop, Linda Xiao, Shanlin Fu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic sciences research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ahmad Yusri Mohd YusopCentre for Forensic Science, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7735-856X
Linda XiaoCentre for Forensic Science, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Australia.
Shanlin FuCentre for Forensic Science, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6238-3612

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proliferation of adulterated health foods and beverages in the market demands a comprehensive analytical strategy to identify the adulterants, particularly those of isomeric phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitors. An instant coffee premix (ICP) purchased from an online retailer was flagged for suspected adulteration through PDE5 inhibition assay. The ICP was then analysed using suspected-target and non-targeted screenings of a liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Based on these findings, a PDE5 inhibitor initially assigned as compound X was isolated from the ICP by employing a liquid chromatography-diode array detection before its structural elucidation with liquid chromatography-ultraviolet (LC-UV) spectroscopy and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The suspected-target screening matched the protonated molecule ([M + H]

Indexed as

food adulterationForensic sciencesnon-targeted screeningphosphodiesterase 5 inhibitorsstructural isomersuspected-target screening

Identifiers

PMID35784429
PMCPMC9245998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.