ArticleAEM education and training2022
Implementation of a novel digital ultrasound education tool into an emergency medicine rotation: UltrasoundBox.
Article in AEM education and training, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contemporary perspectives and debates in student ultrasound education: exploring didactic elements and theoretical aspects.BMC medical education · 2026Review
- Evaluating the role of traditional and nontraditional educational resources in point-of-care ultrasound training: A cross-sectional survey of educator preferences and practices.AEM education and training · 2025Article
- Teaching methods, facilities, and institutions in student ultrasound education (SUSE): e-learning, simulation, and ultrasound skills labs.Journal of ultrasonography · 2025Review
- Implementation of a novel digital ultrasound education tool into an emergency medicine rotation: UltrasoundBox.AEM education and training · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We investigated the educational value of implementing a web-based e-learning program into a medical student emergency medicine rotation. We created "UltrasoundBox," a browser-based application where students interpret ultrasound (US) images. Our goal was to assess how this form of e-learning performs when compared to more passive, lecture-based online US education. We also assessed the how the students interpreted the addition this learning modality to the rotation. Methods: This is a randomized, controlled study to assess the educational outcomes of implementing UltrasoundBox compared to lecture-based US education. Fourth-year medical students on their emergency medicine rotation were enrolled in the study. Students randomized to the control arm were instructed to watch widely available educational lecture videos. Students randomized to the intervention arm received access to UltrasoundBox and were instructed to complete the clinical modules. Both groups completed the same standardized US examination before and after the trial. All the trial participants were given a survey to complete after the trial. Results: We enrolled 42 students, with 23 in the control group and 19 in the intervention group. On the post-intervention examination, the control and intervention groups were found to have mean examination scores of 61.6% and 73.6% respectively, with a statistically significant difference of 12% (95% confidence interval 1.611 to 5.56; Conclusions: We found that medical students using the web-based e-learning platform UltrasoundBox achieved better scores on the examination when compared to the medical students using existing online lecture-based US educational resources. The students reported that the addition of UltrasoundBox added educational value to the rotation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.