Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35784359›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

Specific Antibody and the T-Cell Response Elicited by BNT162b2 Boosting After Two ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 in Common Variable Immunodeficiency.

Vera Goda, Gergely Kriván, Andrea Kulcsár, Márton Gönczi, Szabolcs Tasnády, Zsolt Matula, Ginette Nagy, Gabriella Bekő, Máté Horváth, Ferenc Uher and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Immunizing the imperfect immune system: Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in patients with inborn errors of immunity.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vera GodaPediatric Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Department, Central Hospital of Southern Pest, National Institute of Hematology and Infectious Diseases, Budapest, Hungary.
Gergely KrivánPediatric Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Department, Central Hospital of Southern Pest, National Institute of Hematology and Infectious Diseases, Budapest, Hungary.
Andrea KulcsárDepartment of Special Immunization Services, Central Hospital of Southern Pest, National Institute of Hematology and Infectious Diseases, Budapest, Hungary.
Márton GöncziCentral Laboratory of Central Hospital of Southern Pest, National Institute of Hematology and Infectious Diseases, Budapest, Hungary.
Szabolcs TasnádyCentral Laboratory of Central Hospital of Southern Pest, National Institute of Hematology and Infectious Diseases, Budapest, Hungary.
Zsolt MatulaLaboratory for Experimental Cell Therapy, Central Hospital of Southern Pest, National Institute of Hematology and Infectious Diseases, Budapest, Hungary.
Ginette NagyCentral Laboratory of Central Hospital of Southern Pest, National Institute of Hematology and Infectious Diseases, Budapest, Hungary.
Gabriella BekőCentral Laboratory of Central Hospital of Southern Pest, National Institute of Hematology and Infectious Diseases, Budapest, Hungary.
Máté HorváthDepartmental Group of Infectious Diseases, Semmelweis University Doctoral School of Clinical Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
Ferenc UherLaboratory for Experimental Cell Therapy, Central Hospital of Southern Pest, National Institute of Hematology and Infectious Diseases, Budapest, Hungary.
Zoltán SzekaneczDepartment of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
István Vályi-NagyDepartment of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Central Hospital of Southern Pest, National Institute of Hematology and Infectious Diseases, Budapest, Hungary.
HUN-REN Institute of Experimental Medicine · HUSemmelweis University · HUUniversity of Debrecen · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) patients have markedly decreased immune response to vaccinations. In this study we evaluated humoral and T cell-mediated responses against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-Cov-2) with additional flow cytometric changes in CVID patients receiving booster vaccination with BNT162b2 after two ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. The BNT162b2 vaccine raised the anti-spike protein S immunoglobulin G over the cut-off value from 70% to 83% in CVID, anti-neutralizing antibody had been raised over a cut-off value from 70% to 80% but levels after boosting were significantly less in both tests than in healthy controls (*p=0.02; **p=0.009 respectively). Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin A became less positive in CVID after boosting, but the difference was not significant. The cumulative interferon-γ positive T cell response by ELISpot was over the cut-off value in 53% of the tested individuals and raised to 83% after boosting. This and flow cytometric control of cumulative CD4+ and CD8+ virus-specific T cell absolute counts in CVID were also statistically not different from healthy individuals after boosting. Additional flow cytometric measures for CD45+ lymphocytes, CD3+, and CD19+ cells have not shown significant differences from controls except for lower CD4+T cell counts at both time points (**p=0.003; **p=0.002), in parallel CD4+ virus-specific T-cell ratio was significantly lower in CVID patients at the first time point (*p: 0.03). After boosting, in more than 33% of both CVID patients and also in their healthy controls we detected a decrease in absolute CD45+, CD3+, CD3+CD4+, and CD3+CD8+, CD19+, and CD16+56+ cell counts. CD16+CD56+ cell counts were significantly lower compared to controls before and after boosting (*p=0.02, *p=0.02). CVID patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy throughout the previous year or autologous stem cell transplantation two years before vaccination had worse responses in anti-spike, anti-neutralizing antibody, CD3+CD4+T, CD19+ B, and natural killer cell counts than the whole CVID group. Vaccinations had few side effects. Based on these data, CVID patients receiving booster vaccination with BNT162b2 after two ChadOx1 can effectively elevate the levels of protection against COVID-19 infection, but the duration of the immune response together with COVID-19 morbidity data needs further investigation among these patients.

Indexed as

Common Variable ImmunodeficiencyCOVID-19Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAntigens, CD19BNT162 VaccineChAdOx1 nCoV-19HumansImmunoglobulin GSARS-CoV-2T-LymphocytesTransplantation, AutologousAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAntigens, CD19BNT162 VaccineChAdOx1 nCoV-19Immunoglobulin Ganti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodiescommon variable immunodeficiency (CVID)IFN-γ ELISpot assayIFN-γ producing T cellsprimary immunodeficiencyvaccination

Identifiers

PMID35784359
PMCPMC9247171
OpenAlexW4283029692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.