Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35784227›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in University Students-The Role of Gender, Age, Field of Study, Targeted Degree, and Study Semester.

Dennis Edelmann, Daniel Pfirrmann, Sebastian Heller, Pavel Dietz, Jennifer L Reichel, Antonia M Werner, Markus Schäfer, Ana N Tibubos, Nicole Deci, Stephan Letzel and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. "Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dennis EdelmannDepartment of Sports Medicine, Disease Prevention and Rehabilitation, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Daniel PfirrmannDepartment of Sports Medicine, Disease Prevention and Rehabilitation, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Sebastian HellerInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Medical Centre of the University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Pavel DietzInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Medical Centre of the University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Jennifer L ReichelInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Medical Centre of the University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Antonia M WernerDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Markus SchäferDepartment of Communication, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Ana N TibubosDiagnostics in Healthcare and E-Health, University of Trier, Trier, Germany.
Nicole DeciDepartment of Work and Organizational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Stephan LetzelInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Medical Centre of the University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Perikles SimonDepartment of Sports Medicine, Disease Prevention and Rehabilitation, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Kristin KaloDepartment of Sports Medicine, Disease Prevention and Rehabilitation, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEMSH Medical School Hamburg – University of Applied Sciences and Medical University · DEUniversität Trier · DEUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Physical inactivity and sedentary behavior are modifiable risk factors for an unhealthy lifestyle in university students. The aim of this study was to identify subgroups among German university students with an increased risk for unhealthy behavior. For this purpose, differences in physical activity and sedentary behavior with respect to sociodemographic and study related factors were examined. Methods: A total of 4,351 students participated in an online survey. The amount of physical activity (metabolic equivalent of task-min/week) and the sitting time (h/day) were assessed using the German short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Differences in gender and age as well as field of study, targeted degree and study semester were analyzed using a single factorial ANOVA with Tukey correction or a Welch-ANOVA with Games-Howell correction. Results: For physical activity, significant differences were found for gender ( Conclusion: Female students, students enrolled in "natural sciences, mathematics and informatics" and first year students appear to have an increased risk of an unhealthy lifestyle. Future research should identify barriers to and incentives of physical activity as well as reasons for high amounts of SB in sub-populations of university students. Suitable prevention and intervention programs are necessary.

Indexed as

ExerciseSedentary BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansStudentsUniversitiesmodifiable health influencing factorsphysical activitysedentary behaviorsitting timestudent healthuniversity students

Identifiers

PMID35784227
PMCPMC9244168
OpenAlexW4282958566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.