Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35784168›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental sciences2022

Application of reverse drilling technique in alveolar ridge expansion.

Chen-Chih Chen, Ming-Dih Jeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chen-Chih ChenDepartment of Dentistry, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Ming-Dih JengDepartment of Dentistry, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/purpose: Recently, there is a new model adjustment in the osteotomy preparation named osseodensification. This study focused on the ridge expansion results based on reversed drilling technique regarding osseodensification technique and the modified method. Materials and methods: Twenty-seven samples were fabricated from sawbones, tailored into three different widths: 6.75 mm, 7.25 mm, and 7.75 mm, and drilled by three different protocols: osseodensification bur with 1500 rpm reverse torque, triple-bladed drill with 200 rpm reverse torque, and triple-bladed drill with 1600 rpm standard forward turning; each group contained three samples. After implants were screwed into the sawbones over 5mm or till the bone fractured, the width change of the bone was measured, the insertion depth of the implant was calculated, and the fracture of the bone was also recorded for comparison. Results: The result showed that in narrow bone width (6.75 mm) the enlargement of bone thickness showed significant difference among the groups ( Conclusion: The counter-clockwise rotating method possesses the ability to expand bone ridge but lead to a higher stress in the bone structure, which may affect the insertion depth of the implants.

Indexed as

Alveolar bone expansionDensah burDental implantationModified osseodensificationReverse drilling technique

Identifiers

PMID35784168
PMCPMC9236936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.