ArticleJournal of dental sciences2022
A retrospective comparison of dental treatment under general anesthesia
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- The use of general anesthesia for dental treatment of children with special healthcare needs in Alberta, Canada.International journal of paediatric dentistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: The unmet dental needs are still at the highest rate in patients with special health care needs (SHCN) owing to their physical conditions, lack of cooperation, anxiety and dental fear. This study was aimed to investigate the differences in characteristics and outcomes of dental treatment between general anesthesia (GA) and non-pharmacological approach (NP) in patients with SHCN. Materials and methods: This study reviewed the dental chart records of SHCN patients from 2005 to 2019. The dental chart records were divided into two subgroups: GA and NP groups. The demographic data, recall behavior and treatment outcomes were analyzed and compared between groups. The comparisons between groups were analyzed by Pearson's chi-squared test, Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U test at a significant level of 0.05. Results: Two hundred and sixty-one patients aged 2.2-43.1 years with mean age 14.22 ± 8.64 years old were included. The proportion of cases treated under GA (62%) and NP (38%) was 1.6:1. General anesthesia group had significantly higher in mean ages, caries experience, definitely negative behavior and treatment needs than NP group ( Conclusion: Patients with SHCN who were at older age and had high caries experience with definitely negative behavior and numerous treatment needs were more justifiably for GA. A significant new caries occurrence with faster rate tended towards SHCN patients who underwent GA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.