ArticleJournal of dental sciences2022
The influence of cone beam computed tomography on IRIS-100 implant navigation system.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is frequently used in dental diagnosis and treatment. Comparative studies of the effects of CBCT on implant navigation, however, are still limited. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the computed tomography images of the four commercial brands will affect the accuracy of the new version of IRIS implant navigation system. Materials and methods: In the first part, the accuracy of the IRIS implant navigation system was evaluated by a precision confirmation jig whose position is confirmed. In the second part, the IRIS implant navigation system was used in conjunction with 4 brands of CBCT scans analyzed by its effect on accuracy. Results: The results showed that the mean deviation of the new version of IRIS-100 system accuracy was less than 1 mm. Among the four groups, the overall average deviation caused by CBCT images showed that the 3D eXam group had the smallest error of approximately 0.94 ± 0.12 mm and the AZ 3000 CT group had the largest error of approximately 1.34 ± 0.10 mm. Conclusion: Based on the study, the accuracy of the IRIS implant navigation system will vary with the CBCT image resolution and the status of the CBCT machine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.