ArticleJournal of dental sciences2022
Effects of root-end filling materials on vascular endothelial cell proliferation and tube formation.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: Regarding root-end filling materials in apical surgery, sealing ability and biocompatibility are useful for treatment. Angiogenesis, which occurs in the process of periapical wound healing, is closely related to bone formation. In this study, we investigated the effects of root-end filling materials on vascular endothelial cell proliferation and angiogenesis. Materials and methods: Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), 4-methacryloxyethyl trimellitate anhydride/methyl methacrylate-tri-n-butyl borane (4-META/MMA-TBB) resin, Super EBA, and CS-BG-multi, bioactive glass-related materials, were used. After curing, each material was soaked in a medium for 1 or 7 days, and then cultured for 1-7 days to investigate the effects on human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) proliferation, angiogenesis, and vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs) mRNA expression. Results: In the 1-day soaked sample, there was significantly less proliferation in MTA and Super EBA on day 7 of culture. In the 7-day soaked sample, there was significantly less proliferation in Super EBA and CS-BG-multi on day 7 of culture. Tube formation was significantly high in MTA in both the 1-day and 7-day soaked samples, significantly high in SB in the 1-day soaked sample, and significantly low in Super EBA in both the 1-day and 7-day soaked samples. CS-BG-multi was comparable to the control. VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 mRNA expressions showed an upward trend in MTA, and a trend similar to the control in SB. Conclusion: MTA and 4-META/MMA-TBB resin had a higher pro-angiogenic effect while Super EBA had a less pro-angiogenic effect. CS-BG-multi had low toxicity on tube formation of HUVEC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.