ArticleIEEE robotics and automation letters2022
Object Recognition via Evoked Sensory Feedback during Control of a Prosthetic Hand.
Article in IEEE robotics and automation letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Osseoperceptive EMG Feedback Improves Grasp Force Control in Myoelectric Prosthetic Hands.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- A Psychophysical Dataset for Vibrotactile Augmented Perception.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Development and assessment of vibrotactile feedback from the embedded sensors of a microprocessor-controlled knee prosthesis.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Data-driven design guide for vibrotactile display layouts by continuous mapping.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Extremum-Seeking Control for a Robotic Leg Prosthesis with Sensory Feedback.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Restoring Somatotopic Sensory Feedback in Lower Limb Amputees through Noninvasive Nerve Stimulation.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- A compact solution for vibrotactile proprioceptive feedback of wrist rotation and hand aperture.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Electrical Stimulation of Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces (RPNIs) Induces Referred Sensations in People With Upper Limb Loss.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2024Article
- Real-time adaptive cancellation of TENS feedback artifact on sEMG for prosthesis closed-loop control.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Sensory Restoration for Improved Motor Control of Prostheses.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2023Article
- Experimental Evaluation of a Hybrid Sensory Feedback System for Haptic and Kinaesthetic Perception in Hand Prostheses.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Fusion of dual modalities of non-invasive sensory feedback for object profiling with prosthetic hands.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2023Article
- Object stiffness recognition and vibratory feedback withoutFrontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Closed-loop stimulation of lateral cervical spinal cord in upper-limb amputees to enable sensory discrimination: a case study.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- EMG feedback outperforms force feedback in the presence of prosthesis control disturbance.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Haptic and proprioceptive feedback is critical for sensorimotor integration when we use our hand to perform daily tasks. Here, we evaluated how externally evoked haptic and proprioceptive feedback and myoelectric control strategies affected the recognition of object properties when participants controlled a prosthetic hand. Fingertip haptic sensation was elicited using a transcutaneous nerve stimulation grid to encode the prosthetic's fingertip forces. An array of tactors elicited patterned vibratory stimuli to encode tactile-proprioceptive kinematic information of the prosthetic finger joint. Myoelectric signals of the finger flexor and extensor were used to control the position or velocity of joint angles of the prosthesis. Participants were asked to perform object property (stiffness and size) recognition, by controlling the prosthetic hand with concurrent haptic and tactile-proprioceptive feedback. With the evoked feedback, intact and amputee participants recognized the object stiffness and size at success rates ranging from 50% to 100% in both position and velocity control with no significant difference across control schemes. Our findings show that evoked somatosensory feedback in a non-invasive manner can facilitate closed-loop control of the prosthetic hand and allowed for simultaneous recognition of different object properties. The outcomes can facilitate our understanding on the role of sensory feedback during bidirectional human-machine interactions, which can potentially promote user experience in object interactions using prosthetic hands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.