Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35784064›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2022

Shotgun metagenomics of soil invertebrate communities reflects taxonomy, biomass, and reference genome properties.

Alexandra Schmidt, Clément Schneider, Peter Decker, Karin Hohberg, Jörg Römbke, Ricarda Lehmitz, Miklós Bálint

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandra SchmidtSenckenberg Biodiversity Climate Research Center Frankfurt am Main Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9262-0941
Clément SchneiderLoewe Center for Translational Biodiversity Genomics (LOEWE-TBG) Frankfurt am Main Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3743-9319
Peter DeckerLoewe Center for Translational Biodiversity Genomics (LOEWE-TBG) Frankfurt am Main Germany.
Karin HohbergLoewe Center for Translational Biodiversity Genomics (LOEWE-TBG) Frankfurt am Main Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9681-9157
Jörg RömbkeECT Oekotoxikologie GmbH Flörsheim am Main Germany.
Ricarda LehmitzLoewe Center for Translational Biodiversity Genomics (LOEWE-TBG) Frankfurt am Main Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3122-5002
Miklós BálintSenckenberg Biodiversity Climate Research Center Frankfurt am Main Germany.
LOEWE Centre for Translational Biodiversity Genomics · DEECT Oekotoxikologie (Germany) · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEJustus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DEKlinikum Görlitz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metagenomics - shotgun sequencing of all DNA fragments from a community DNA extract - is routinely used to describe the composition, structure, and function of microorganism communities. Advances in DNA sequencing and the availability of genome databases increasingly allow the use of shotgun metagenomics on eukaryotic communities. Metagenomics offers major advances in the recovery of biomass relationships in a sample, in comparison to taxonomic marker gene-based approaches (metabarcoding). However, little is known about the factors which influence metagenomics data from eukaryotic communities, such as differences among organism groups, the properties of reference genomes, and genome assemblies.We evaluated how shotgun metagenomics records composition and biomass in artificial soil invertebrate communities at different sequencing efforts. We generated mock communities of controlled biomass ratios from 28 species from all major soil mesofauna groups: mites, springtails, nematodes, tardigrades, and potworms. We shotgun sequenced these communities and taxonomically assigned them with a database of over 270 soil invertebrate genomes.We recovered over 95% of the species, and observed relatively high false-positive detection rates. We found strong differences in reads assigned to different taxa, with some groups (e.g., springtails) consistently attracting more hits than others (e.g., enchytraeids). Original biomass could be predicted from read counts after considering these taxon-specific differences. Species with larger genomes, and with more complete assemblies, consistently attracted more reads than species with smaller genomes. The GC content of the genome assemblies had no effect on the biomass-read relationships. Results were similar among different sequencing efforts.The results show considerable differences in taxon recovery and taxon specificity of biomass recovery from metagenomic sequence data. The properties of reference genomes and genome assemblies also influence biomass recovery, and they should be considered in metagenomic studies of eukaryotes. We show that low- and high-sequencing efforts yield similar results, suggesting high cost-efficiency of metagenomics for eukaryotic communities. We provide a brief roadmap for investigating factors which influence metagenomics-based eukaryotic community reconstructions. Understanding these factors is timely as accessibility of DNA sequencing and momentum for reference genomes projects show a future where the taxonomic assignment of DNA from any community sample becomes a reality.

Indexed as

biomonitoringeukaryotesgenome completenessgenome sizeinvertebratesshotgun metagenomicsspecies compositiontaxonomic bias

Identifiers

PMID35784064
PMCPMC9170594
OpenAlexW4281624223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.