Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35784054›Full record

ReviewEcology and evolution2022

Dietary patterns of a versatile large carnivore, the puma (

Harshad Karandikar, Mitchell W Serota, Wilson C Sherman, Jennifer R Green, Guadalupe Verta, Claire Kremen, Arthur D Middleton

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Seasonal resource partitioning between neighboring cougars in a multiprey system.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Harshad KarandikarDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy & Management Mulford Hall University of California Berkeley California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6005-2852
Mitchell W SerotaDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy & Management Mulford Hall University of California Berkeley California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8885-5577
Wilson C ShermanDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy & Management Mulford Hall University of California Berkeley California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9192-7204
Jennifer R GreenDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy & Management Mulford Hall University of California Berkeley California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8433-3405
Guadalupe VertaDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy & Management Mulford Hall University of California Berkeley California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6467-2047
Claire KremenDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy & Management Mulford Hall University of California Berkeley California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6909-4605
Arthur D MiddletonDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy & Management Mulford Hall University of California Berkeley California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3887-0434
University of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large carnivores play critical roles in terrestrial ecosystems but have suffered dramatic range contractions over the past two centuries. Developing an accurate understanding of large carnivore diets is an important first step towards an improved understanding of their ecological roles and addressing the conservation challenges faced by these species.The puma is one of seven large felid species in the world and the only one native to the non-tropical regions of the New World. We conducted a meta-analysis of puma diets across the species' range in the Americas and assessed the impact of varying environmental conditions, niche roles, and human activity on puma diets. Pumas displayed remarkable dietary flexibility, consuming at least 232 different prey species, including one Critically Endangered and five Endangered species.Our meta-analysis found clear patterns in puma diets with changing habitat and environmental conditions. Pumas consumed more larger-bodied prey species with increasing distance from the equator, but consumption of medium-sized species showed the opposite trend.Puma diets varied with their realized niche; however, contrary to our expectations, puma consumption of large species did not change with their trophic position, and pumas consumed more small prey and birds as apex predators. Consumption of domestic species was negatively correlated with consumption of medium-sized wild species, a finding which underscores the importance of maintaining intact native prey assemblages.The tremendous dietary flexibility displayed by pumas represents both an opportunity and a challenge for understanding the puma's role in ecosystems and for the species' management and conservation. Future studies should explore the linkages between availability and selection of primary and other wild prey, and consequent impacts on predation of domestic species, in order to guide conservation actions and reduce conflict between pumas and people.

Indexed as

dietfeeding ecologylarge carnivorepredationpuma

Identifiers

PMID35784054
PMCPMC9240727
OpenAlexW4283689287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.