Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35784032›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2022

Promoting lab culture to enhance academic resilience during crises.

Ignasi Arranz, Regina Nobre, Julien Cucherousset, Aline Reis de Carvalho, Amanda Cantarute-Rodrigues, Pierre Favriou, Flavien Garcia, Marie Gimenez, Alexis Imbert, Valentin Marin and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ignasi ArranzLaboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique (EDB) UMR5174 Université Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier CNRS IRD Toulouse France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1517-1713
Regina NobreLaboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique (EDB) UMR5174 Université Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier CNRS IRD Toulouse France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9866-3467
Julien CucheroussetLaboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique (EDB) UMR5174 Université Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier CNRS IRD Toulouse France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0533-9479
Aline Reis de CarvalhoLaboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique (EDB) UMR5174 Université Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier CNRS IRD Toulouse France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0483-9538
Amanda Cantarute-RodriguesLaboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique (EDB) UMR5174 Université Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier CNRS IRD Toulouse France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3394-1865
Pierre FavriouLaboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique (EDB) UMR5174 Université Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier CNRS IRD Toulouse France.
Flavien GarciaLaboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique (EDB) UMR5174 Université Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier CNRS IRD Toulouse France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0302-7255
Marie GimenezLaboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique (EDB) UMR5174 Université Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier CNRS IRD Toulouse France.
Alexis ImbertLaboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique (EDB) UMR5174 Université Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier CNRS IRD Toulouse France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5377-9546
Valentin MarinLaboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique (EDB) UMR5174 Université Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier CNRS IRD Toulouse France.
Ivan Paz-VinasLaboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique (EDB) UMR5174 Université Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier CNRS IRD Toulouse France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0043-9289

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has heavily impacted academics' professional and personal lives, forcing many research groups (labs) to shift from an academic system primarily based on in-person work to an almost full-time remote workforce during lockdowns. Labs are generally characterized by a strong lab culture that underpins all research and social activities of its members. Lab culture traditionally builds on the pillars of in-person communication, knowledge sharing, and all social and professional activities that promote collaboration, team building, scientific productivity, and well-being. Here, we use the experience of our research group facing the COVID-19 pandemic to illustrate how proactively reinforcing lab culture and its positive outcomes have been essential to our lab when transitioning from an in-person to a remote lab environment, and through its ongoing evolution toward a hybrid remote/in-person model. We argue that the proactive promotion of lab culture in research groups can foster academic resilience during crises, helping research groups to maintain their capacity to conduct scientific activities while preserving a sustainable life/work balance and a healthy mental condition.

Indexed as

adaptabilitycrisisremote working environmentresearch groupsocial restrictionsvirtual lab

Identifiers

PMID35784032
PMCPMC9203588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.