ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence reports2022
Social determinants of health and emergency department utilization among adults receiving buprenorphine for opioid use disorder.
Article in Drug and alcohol dependence reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between comorbid chronic pain or prior hospitalization for mental illness and substance use treatment among a cohort at high risk of opioid overdose.Journal of substance use and addiction treatment · 2024Trial
- Retention Challenges in Opioid Use Disorder Treatment: The Role of Comorbid Psychological Conditions.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Implementing buprenorphine for opioid use disorder in veterans health administration primary care: a qualitative analysis.Addiction science & clinical practice · 2025Article
- Social Risk and Acute Health Care Utilization Among Insured Adults.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Emergency Department-Based Medication for Opioid Use Disorder Program: Addressing Gaps in Linkages to Care.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) use the emergency department (ED) at high rates. Medication treatment for OUD (MOUD) is associated with reduced ED utilization. However, individuals receiving MOUD still utilize ED services at higher rates than the general population. The objective of this study is to compare the psychosocial and clinical characteristics of those who do and do not utilize ED services based on the Healthy People 2030 framework regarding social determinants of health (SDoH) among a sample of individuals receiving MOUD. Methods: Participants receiving buprenorphine for OUD at an outpatient addiction clinic completed a cross-sectional survey between July and September 2019. A 6-month prospective medical record review was conducted. The primary outcome was ED visit (yes/no) during the 6-month study period. Demographic, psychosocial, and clinical characteristics were gathered from survey measures and chart abstraction. Chi square and T-tests tested differences by ED utilization. Results: Participants (n=142) were 54.9% female and 68.8% Black, with an average age of 43.2 years (SD=12.5). Of the participants, 38.7% visited the ED in the study period, primarily for infectious or musculoskeletal causes. Participants with an ED visit were more likely to be Black (p=.011), have less social support (p=.030), more medical comorbidities (p=.008) including chronic pain (p=.045), and more visits with an addiction provider in the study period (p=.009). Conclusions: Factors associated with ED utilization among individuals receiving buprenorphine for OUD include low social support and medical comorbidities, including chronic pain. More research is needed on modifiable SDoH that influence ED utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.