ArticleCureus2022
The Utilization of Lumbar MRI for Lower Back Pain at National Guard Hospital, Jeddah: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Magnetic reasoning imaging (MRI) is the imaging modality of choice for detecting spinal pathologies. The study of the appropriateness of MRI utilization in Saudi Arabia is lacking. As a result, this research aims to assess the use and misuse of lumbar MRI in lower back pain (LBP) at the National Guard Hospital (NGH) in Jeddah city. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study that included all adult patients who had lumbar MRI for LBP at NGH in 2019. A total of 1,225 patients were included. Patients with extreme ages, trauma, recent lumbar spine surgery, spine or spinal canal tumors, and infection were excluded, leaving a number of 805 patients. Specific MRI findings were obtained and assessed in association with history and physical examination. Results LBP with radiculopathy was the most common complaint (82.9%) followed by LBP without radiculopathy (12.8%), with the lowest being limb pain alone (2.6%). Overall, 72% of patients had negative MRI findings, which did not explain their symptoms, and 28% had positive MRI findings that were not associated with their symptoms (p < 0.001). A complete physical examination was performed on 27.5% of patients, of which only 12% had positive findings. MRI was ordered for 72.5% of patients without a complete physical examination. Finally, 88.2% of patients who had MRI were managed conservatively, while only 6.7% were managed with surgery (p < 0.04). Conclusion The number of patients who had proper assessment prior to the ordering of MRI was significantly low. The decision to request MRI was not based on any scientific basis. This study has demonstrated that without proper and strict guidelines, MRIs will continue to be overutilized, which, in turn, will have negative consequences on the waiting time for an MRI and the cost of all the unnecessary MRIs. Furthermore, a good number of patients nowadays who do not have any indications for an MRI keep asking their physicians for it, and if the physician refuses, they transfer to another physician who will order the MRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.