Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35783866›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Characterizing Diagnostic Inertia in Arterial Hypertension With a Gender Perspective in Primary Care.

Vicente Pallares-Carratala, Concepcion Carratala-Munuera, Adriana Lopez-Pineda, Jose Antonio Quesada, Vicente Gil-Guillen, Domingo Orozco-Beltran, Jose L Alfonso-Sanchez, Jorge Navarro-Perez, Jose M Martin-Moreno

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Editorial: Women in hypertension.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Vicente Pallares-CarratalaHealth Surveillance Unit, Castellon Mutual Insurance Union, Castellón, Spain.
Concepcion Carratala-MunueraClinical Medicine Department, Miguel Hernandez University, Elche, Spain.
Adriana Lopez-PinedaClinical Medicine Department, Miguel Hernandez University, Elche, Spain.
Jose Antonio QuesadaClinical Medicine Department, Miguel Hernandez University, Elche, Spain.
Vicente Gil-GuillenClinical Medicine Department, Miguel Hernandez University, Elche, Spain.
Domingo Orozco-BeltranClinical Medicine Department, Miguel Hernandez University, Elche, Spain.
Jose L Alfonso-SanchezDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Jorge Navarro-PerezBiomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Clinic University Hospital of Valencia, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Jose M Martin-MorenoDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx · ESUniversitat de València · ESINCLIVA Health Research Institute · ESUniversitat Jaume I · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Substantial evidence shows that diagnostic inertia leads to failure to achieve screening and diagnosis objectives for arterial hypertension (AHT). In addition, different studies suggest that the results may differ between men and women. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in diagnostic inertia in women and men attending public primary care centers, to identify potential gender biases in the clinical management of AHT. Study Design/Materials and Methods: Cross-sectional descriptive and analytical estimates were obtained nested on an epidemiological ambispective cohort study of patients aged ≥30 years who attended public primary care centers in a Spanish region in the period 2008-2012, belonging to the ESCARVAL-RISK cohort. We applied a consistent operational definition of diagnostic inertia to a registry- reflected population group of 44,221 patients with diagnosed hypertension or meeting the criteria for diagnosis (51.2% women), with a mean age of 63.4 years (62.4 years in men and 64.4 years in women). Results: Of the total population, 95.5% had a diagnosis of hypertension registered in their electronic health record. Another 1,968 patients met the inclusion criteria for diagnostic inertia of hypertension, representing 4.5% of the total population (5% of men and 3.9% of women). The factors significantly associated with inertia were younger age, normal body mass index, elevated total cholesterol, coexistence of diabetes and dyslipidemia, and treatment with oral antidiabetic drugs. Lower inertia was associated with age over 50 years, higher body mass index, normal total cholesterol, no diabetes or dyslipidemia, and treatment with lipid-lowering, antiplatelet, and anticoagulant drugs. The only gender difference in the association of factors with diagnostic inertia was found in waist circumference. Conclusion: In the ESCARVAL-RISK study population presenting registered AHT or meeting the functional diagnostic criteria for AHT, diagnostic inertia appears to be greater in men than in women.

Indexed as

arterial hypertensiondiagnostic inertiaequitygenderprimary care

Identifiers

PMID35783866
PMCPMC9246269
OpenAlexW4283031714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.