ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022
Understanding
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of 13-week dialectical behavior therapy skills training for non-suicidal self-injury: a multi-center randomized clinical trial in China.Psychological medicine · 2026Trial
- Prioritization and heterogeneity in information disclosure: a conjoint and cluster analysis on Chinese medical students' decision-making.BMC medical ethics · 2026Observational
- Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Fear Avoidance Component Scale (FACS).Pain research & management · 2024Article
- The impact of organizational politics on work engagement-the mediating role of the doctrine of the mean.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Public objectives and policy instruments for improving the quality of postgraduate education in China.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Accelerating the science and practice of psychology beyond WEIRD biases: Enriching the landscape through Asian psychology.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Relationships between proactive personality and creativity: Mindsets and golden mean thinking as parallel mediators among Chinese third language students.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.