Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35783696›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

Treatment Satisfaction With Couplelinks Online Intervention to Promote Dyadic Coping in Young Couples Affected by Breast Cancer.

Karen Fergus, Adina Tanen, Saunia Ahmad, Sandra Gardner, Ellen Warner, Deborah McLeod, Joanne Stephen, Wendy Carter, Amanda Periera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Coping with primary brain tumors together: a scoping review of dyadic psychosocial interventions.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. The dyadic associations among self-efficacy, dyadic coping, and health-related quality of life between high-risk pregnant women and spouses: a cross-sectional study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Karen FergusPsychosocial Oncology Lab, Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Adina TanenSchool of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Saunia AhmadOdette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sandra GardnerRotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ellen WarnerOdette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Deborah McLeodSchool of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Joanne StephenClinical Neurosciences, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Wendy CarterToronto Academic Pain Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Amanda PerieraPsychosocial Oncology Lab, Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study evaluated participant satisfaction with "Couplelinks," an online psychological intervention designed for younger couples coping with breast cancer. The program included six experiential learning exercises (plus one optional module), psychoeducational information, and support from a personal mental health professional. Objective: The primary objectives were to examine participants' perceptions of: the online intervention's structure and content; the value of including a professional facilitator; and benefits and drawbacks of the program. Methods: A treatment satisfaction questionnaire comprised of Likert indices and open-ended questions pertaining to treatment satisfaction was completed by 26 patients and 27 male partners ( Results: Participants reported an overall satisfaction rating of 4.3 out of 5 ( Conclusion: Such feedback supports the feasibility and acceptability of the Couplelinks program while offering directions for improvement of online couple-based interventions in cancer.

Indexed as

breast cancercouplesdyadic copinginterventiononlinepsychosocialsatisfactionyoung

Identifiers

PMID35783696
PMCPMC9245623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.