Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35783649›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Process Evaluation of an Implementation Trial: Design, Rationale, and Early Lessons Learnt From an International Cluster Clinical Trial in Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Menglu Ouyang, Craig S Anderson, Lili Song, Alejandra Malavera, Stephen Jan, Guojuan Cheng, Honglin Chu, Xin Hu, Lu Ma, Xiaoying Chen and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03209258 (An Investigator Initiated and Conducted, International, Multicenter, Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Study of a Care Bundle of Physiological Control Strategies in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03209258 nacompletednot on this map

An Investigator Initiated and Conducted, International, Multicenter, Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Study of a Care Bundle of Physiological Control Strategies in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe George Institute for Global Health, ChinaRan2017 to 2022Enrolled7,067ConditionsCerebral Hemorrhage, Stroke, Hypertension, DiabetesArmsCare bundle of active management, Usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Menglu OuyangThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Craig S AndersonThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Lili SongThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Alejandra MalaveraThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Stephen JanThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Guojuan ChengThe George Institute China at Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
Honglin ChuResearch Center of Clinical Epidemiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xin HuDepartment of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Lu MaDepartment of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xiaoying ChenThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Chao YouDepartment of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Hueiming LiuThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AUPeking University · CNSichuan University · CNThe George Institute for Global Health · AUGeorge Institute for Global Health · CNPeking University Third Hospital · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The third INTEnsive care bundle with blood pressure Reduction in Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage Trial (INTERACT3) is an ongoing, international, multicenter, stepped-wedge cluster, prospective, randomized, open, blinded endpoint assessed trial evaluating the effectiveness of a quality improvement "care bundle" for the management of patients with acute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). An embedded process evaluation aims to explore the uptake and implementation of the intervention, and understand the context and stakeholder perspectives, for interpreting the trial outcomes. Methodology: The design was informed by Normalization Process Theory and the UK Medical Research Council process evaluation guidance. Mixed methods are used to evaluate the implementation outcomes of fidelity, reach, dose, acceptability, appropriateness, adoption, sustainability, and relevant contextual factors and mechanisms affecting delivery of the care bundle. Semi-structured interviews and non-participant observations are conducted with the primary implementers (physicians and nurses) and patients/carers to explore how the care bundle was integrated into routine care. Focus group discussions are conducted with investigators and project operational staff to understand challenges and possible solutions in the organization of the trial. Data from observational records, surveys, routine monitoring data, field notes and case report forms, inform contextual factors, and adoption of the intervention. Purposive sampling of sites according to pre-specified criteria is used to achieve sample representativeness. Discussion: Implementation outcomes, and relevant barriers and facilitators to integrating the care bundle into routine practice, will be reported after completion of the process evaluation. The embedded process evaluation will aid understanding of the causal mechanisms between care bundle elements and clinical outcomes within complex health systems across diverse LMIC settings. Trial Registration: The INTERACT3 study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03209258).

Indexed as

clinical trialimplementation scienceintracerebral hemorrhageprocess evaluationstroke

Identifiers

PMID35783649
PMCPMC9240283
OpenAlexW4282915245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.