Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35783610›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

The Efficiency of Convalescent Plasma Therapy in the Management of Critically Ill Patients Infected With COVID-19: A Matched Cohort Study.

Chun Pan, Hui Chen, Jianfeng Xie, Yingzi Huang, Yi Yang, Bin Du, Haibo Qiu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04616976 (Efficiency of Convalescent Plasma Therapy in Management of Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04616976 completednot on this map

Efficiency of Convalescent Plasma Therapy in Management of Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19: a Matched Case-control Study

TypeobservationalSponsorSoutheast University, ChinaRan2020 to 2020Enrolled78ConditionsCOVID-19 Convalescent Plasma TreatmentArmsconvalescent plasma
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chun PanJiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Hui ChenJiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Jianfeng XieJiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Yingzi HuangJiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Yi YangJiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Bin DuMedical Intensive Care Unit, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Haibo QiuJiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Zhongda Hospital Southeast University · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The convalescent plasma of patients who recover from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) contains high titers of neutralizing antibodies, which has potential effects on the viral shedding of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and improving the prognosis of patients with COVID-19. The goal of this study was to clarify the effects of convalescent plasma therapy on the 60-day mortality and negative conversion rate of SARS-CoV-2 during the hospitalization of patients with severe and life-threatening COVID-19 infection. Methods: This was a retrospective, case-matched cohort study that involved patients with severe COVID-19 infections. The patients who received convalescent plasma therapy were matched by age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, heart failure, the onset of symptoms to hospital admission, respiratory support pattern, lymphocyte count, troponin, Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), glucocorticoid, and antiviral agents to no more than three patients with COVID-19 who did not receive convalescent plasma therapy. A Cox regression model and competing risk analysis were used to evaluate the effects of convalescent plasma therapy on these patients. Results: Twenty-six patients were in the convalescent plasma therapy group, and 78 patients were in the control group. Demographic characteristics were similar in both groups, except for the SOFA score. Convalescent plasma therapy did not improve 60-day mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.44, 95% CI 0.82-2.51, Conclusion: Convalescent plasma therapy could improve the SARS-CoV-2 negative conversion rate but could not improve 60-day mortality in patients with severe and life-threatening COVID-19 infection. Clinical Trial Number: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04616976).

Indexed as

convalescent plasma therapyCOVID-19mechanical ventilationmortalityviral shedding

Identifiers

PMID35783610
PMCPMC9243335
OpenAlexW4282967599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.