Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35783593›Full record

ReviewBJUI compass2022

The challenges in diagnosis and management of osteitis pubis: An algorithm based on current evidence.

Mohammed Lotfi Amer, Kawa Omar, Sachin Malde, Rajesh Nair, Ramesh Thurairaja, Muhammad Shamim Khan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJUI compass, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohammed Lotfi AmerFaculty of Medicine Tanta University Tanta Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4620-3423
Kawa OmarDepartment of Urology Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK.
Sachin MaldeDepartment of Urology Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK.
Rajesh NairDepartment of Urology Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1760-9608
Ramesh ThurairajaDepartment of Urology Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK.
Muhammad Shamim KhanDepartment of Urology Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to summarise the contemporary evidence regarding the prevalence, diagnosis, and management of osteitis pubis (OP) specially from urological point of view, while proposing an algorithm for the best management based on the current evidence. Methods: We performed a literature search using the PubMed database for the term 'osteitis pubis' until December 2020. We assessed pre-clinical and clinical studies regarding the aetiology, pathophysiology, and management of OP. Case reports and case series were evaluated by study quality and patient outcomes to determine a potential clinical management algorithm. Results: Osteitis pubis is a chronic painful condition of the symphysis pubis joint and its surrounding structures. Still, there is a paucity of data outlining the management plan and the possible triggers. The aetiology seems to be multifactorial with different proposals trying to explain the pathophysiology and correlate the findings to the outcome. The diagnosis is usually based on high suspicion index and clinical experience. The infective variant of the disease is aggressive and requires strict and active management. Universal consensus is still lacking regarding a formal algorithm of management of the condition, especially due to multiple specialities involved in the decision-making process. Conservative management remains the cornerstone; nevertheless, surgical interventions may be needed in special settings. Hence, a multi-disciplinary approach is of pivotal value in fashioning the plan for each case. The prognosis is usually satisfactory; however, a longstanding debilitating disease form is not uncommon. Conclusion: OP remains a rare condition with real challenges in its diagnosis. The current management is focused on conservative management; however, surgical intervention is still needed in some difficult scenarios. Continued research into the triggers of OP, multidisciplinary approach, and standardised clinical pathways can improve the quality of care for patients suffering from this condition.

Indexed as

chronic pelvic painosteitis pubisosteomyelitis pubis

Identifiers

PMID35783593
PMCPMC9231671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.