Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35783590›Full record

ArticleBJUI compass2022

Real world outcomes of biopsy-proven oncocytic neoplasm of the kidney managed by surveillance.

Flora E Rodger, Keiran Brown, Steve Leung, Jack Coode-Bate, James Armitage, Anne Warren, Jane Hendry, Grant D Stewart, Alex Laird, Grenville M Oades

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJUI compass, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Flora E RodgerDepartment of Urology Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Glasgow UK.
Keiran BrownDepartment of Urology Western General Hospital Edinburgh UK.
Steve LeungDepartment of Urology The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital Edinburgh UK.
Jack Coode-BateDepartment of Urology University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust Plymouth UK.
James ArmitageDepartment of Urology Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust Cambridge UK.
Anne WarrenDepartment of Pathology Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust Cambridge UK.
Jane HendryDepartment of Urology Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Glasgow UK.
Grant D StewartDepartment of Urology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3188-9140
Alex LairdDepartment of Urology The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital Edinburgh UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7296-025X
Grenville M OadesDepartment of Urology Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Glasgow UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6897-8425

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate outcomes of patients diagnosed with oncocytic renal neoplasms on routine renal mass biopsy and to describe the natural history of these tumours when managed with surveillance as opposed to immediate intervention. To report disease-specific survival. Patients and methods: Patients were identified from a retrospective review of pathology databases from three tertiary referral centres that utilise renal mass biopsy in routine clinical practice. All patients with biopsy-proven oncocytic tumours were included and a retrospective review of online patient records was undertaken. Results: There were 184 biopsy-proven oncocytic renal neoplasms identified in 172 patients. There were two biopsy complications (both pneumothorax, Clavien-Dindo Grade I). Of these lesions, 135 were reported as oncocytomas or oncocytic renal neoplasms that were not further classified and 37 were reported as chromophobe carcinoma (ChRCC). The median age at diagnosis was 70 (33-88). The average tumour diameter at diagnosis was 33 mm. One hundred seven tumours were initially managed with surveillance (including 13 ChRCC) with a minimum follow-up of 6 months and a median of 39 months (6-144) whereas 49 patients underwent immediate treatment. The mean growth rate across all oncocytic renal neoplasms managed by surveillance was 3 mm/year. There was no statistically significant difference in growth rates between oncocytic renal neoplasms and ChRCC. Thirteen patients with oncocytic renal neoplasms initially managed by surveillance moved on to an active management strategy during follow-up. The clinical indication given for a change from surveillance was tumour growth in 12 cases and patient choice in 1 case. Where definitive pathology was available, there was 85% concordance with the biopsy. There were no cases of development of metastatic disease or disease-related morbidity or mortality during the study. Conclusions: This multicentre retrospective cohort study supports the hypothesis that selected biopsy-proven oncocytic renal neoplasms can be safely managed with surveillance in the medium term. Routine renal mass biopsy may reduce surgery for benign or indolent renal tumours and the potential associated morbidity for these patients.

Indexed as

biopsychromophobe carcinomaoncocyticoncocytomasurveillance

Identifiers

PMID35783590
PMCPMC9231677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.